• Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      True enough, it’ll definitely be distended and have signs of visible arousal during the moments that someone is having vaginal intercourse. No long-term changes after arousal does down, tho.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Correct but only during sex. Returns to normal after use. Not like this picture suggest that the more sex you have the more of an outie you get

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not only that, but every 7 year all your cells in your body are replaced.

        So if you don’t have sex for 7 years, you are back to being a virgin.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah yes, obviously this is true. I’ve had to circumcise myself every 7 years as a result. Fortunately foreskins are useful for witchcraft, so it’s kind of like a side hustle.

        • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          That’s actually not true, there are quite a lot of cells in our bodies which are never replaced such as the lenses, cones, and rods in our eyes, egg cells, neurons, the hairs that detect sound in our ears, our heart muscles, among many others. The ones that do get replaced vary greatly in how long that takes or how often it happens.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re saying during sex which yes there are physical changes to the presentation that occur when aroused. Not this bullshit sandwich effect for sure but still, they’re not wrong it’s just a really weird point.

        • knightry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The person you’re replying to is named Send me photos. I think they were just trying to get some noods.

          edit: typo

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I see that, but I responded because the person above sendmephotos was negative and it kinda bothered me.