PARIS, Nov 27 (Reuters) - Six teenagers go on trial behind closed doors on Monday, accused of involvement in the beheading of French history teacher Samuel Paty by a suspected Islamist in 2020 in an attack that struck at the heart of the country’s secular values.

The teacher had shown his pupils cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad in a class on freedom of expression, angering a number of Muslim parents. Muslims believe that any depiction of the Prophet is blasphemous.

  • filoria@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Nobody knows anything except their names and what they themselves claim. The primary author and editor shares a name with a prominent American lawyer, and that’s about all we know. I’ve tried digging into the guy (he claims to have a physiology degree and works in healthcare), but I can’t find a single source that indicates he even exist.

    Edit: anyone who tries to tell me that a name on a mortgage is an indication that someone exists should look a little bit more closely at those documents. I’ll wait.

      • filoria@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I always find it funny how there’s some people who are extremely keen on advocating for a person with no established credentials and little to indicate that they actually exist. Almost like they feel personally attacked, or something.

          • filoria@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            So… I take it you know this guy, then?

            That’s pretty cool.

              • filoria@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why would I brigade a conversation with someone who clearly trusts whatever is given to them without critical thought?

                  • filoria@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Seeing aberrations isn’t a good thing… I guess if everyone who disagrees with you is a bot with a bot farm, you can never be wrong?