Bill Gates says a 3-day work week where ‘machines can make all the food and stuff’ isn’t a bad idea::“A society where you only have to work three days a week, that’s probably OK,” Bill Gates said.

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Assuming the owners of those machines don’t restrict the people’s access to that “food and stuff”

    • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You think Bill Gates of all people don’t know that? He’s just trying to gaslight us into thinking the stupid-rich gigacorporation owners like him are the solution and not the problem.

      • Isthisreddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know about that. Young ruthless Bill Gates was another person, older and wiser Bill Gates has already achieved richest person in the world, Forbes #1, etc etc - all that’s in the rearview mirror - I believe he has awakened and realized it takes a village and he wants his legacy to reflect that

        • pedz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just goes to show how you can change your public image with shit loads of money. He just laundered his image real good and you just ate it up.

          He has not “awakened” to anything. He’s just very good at selling his BS. What’s even worse is that now if you bring up his shitty ways, you are associated with the anti vax idiots.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          What’s more likely, a complete reversal of his world view, or a good PR team and some coaching. I’m not buying the first, especially considering that his Jeffrey Epstein association came after he left MS and started running his charitable foundation.

        • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bill Gates hasn’t really changed dude. He’s just developed a thicker veneer. He’s the largest landowner in the US now, because he’s been buying up as much arable land as possible. He can say its BAU all he wants, it’s incredibly sketchy af. Now in conjunction with this statement, its easy to see where once he cornered the software market, you could infer he’s aspiring to do the same with food with full automation.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      People who sell things that are in high demand and necessary for survival generally are not in the practice of denying people access to those things.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Health care providers are not in the habit of denying care. Health insurers are because they have a perverse incentives to do so - this is why they should not exist

          • 20hzservers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly the people who sell the thing in high demand the issurers are in the business of denying care to people by raising prices on healthcare. I feel like your mind is in the right place I agree insurance companies shouldn’t exist but what you said in your first comment is false large companies who sell high demand products absolutely gouge on prices all of the time.

            • SCB@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s literally not true though. They compete with each other over offering the lowest price.

              • 20hzservers@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s funny. In reality they compete on increasing shareholder profits by colluding on prices and paying their employees as little as possible. And to be crystal clear “they” are the CEOS/boards of most major companies.

              • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                In what world? Outside of government exchanges, you’re limited to the plan your employer offers you.

                • SCB@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  We were discussing large corps that aren’t insurance companies

      • Flambo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        if you won’t deny a thing to someone it’s pretty hard to sell it to anyone

      • eskimofry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also, What mind bending drugs are you on? Healthcare is riddled with examples of denied insurance claims for treatments.

      • isles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        denying people access to those things.

        The only way I can reconcile your statement is if you finish it with “if they can afford it”. Which also makes your statement meaningless. No one was ever arguing that business denies products/services to those who can pay for them.

        Health care, food, and shelter are all in high demand, necessary for survival, and if you can’t afford it, you are denied it.

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No one was ever arguing that business denies products/services to those who can pay for them.

          “If they can afford it” suggests otherwise.

          Yes, things do indeed cost money and always will until we discover replicator tech.