• TheLurker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No they didn’t. You have gone from misrepresentation to straight out lying now.

    The UK twice offered Argentina to take the matter to the International Court of Justice. Twice Argentina refused and instead STARTED A WAR. Then got is arse kicked and have been bitching about it ever since.

      • TheLurker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is literally in the Wikipedia article you keep linking all over this post.

        So I guess that proves you didn’t read your own sources. You just cherry picked and misrepresented sections of it.

      • mykl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure that this link really helps your case, given these key points from the description:

        The resolution by the British representative, Ambassador Sir Anthony Parsons

        demanded an immediate cessation of hostilities between Argentina and the United Kingdom and a complete withdrawal by Argentine forces

        Resolution 502 was in the United Kingdom’s favour by giving it the option to invoke Article 51 of the United Nations Charter and to claim the right of self-defence

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure that this link really helps your case

          The parts you quoted were about self-defense and stopping the fighting, not about the ownership of the islands.

          I quote it because it also talks about negotiations that should be begun when it comes to the ownership of the islands, in lieu of continuing the fighting.

          I’m already on record about stating that the fighting was wrong, though I don’t know how long anyone would expect a nation to wait for a diplomatic solution.

          This press release from the UN goes into more detail on the basic structure of what I’m arguing about: https://press.un.org/en/2021/gacol3347.doc.htm

          (I really shouldn’t bother with attempting nuanced conversation on the Internet, it never ends well.)

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              but surely you realize that Argentina shouldn’t expect (or want) to gain sovereignty over the Falklands

              No, quite the opposite actually. I believe they have more of a claim to the islands than anyone else, via Spain’s ownership of said lands that Argentina inherited when they gained their independence from Spain, as well as the proximity to Argentina, and finally to the fact that Great Britain was speaking with Argentina about turning them over, before the stupid war was started.

              Now, having said that, IANAL, so don’t know what the law would say about that. Really don’t think we’ll resolve the issue here on Lemmy.

              • QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I fail to see any tangible benefits of ceding islands inhabited almost exclusively by British and French people to a former Spanish colony, but perhaps you know more than I do.

                • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I fail to see any tangible benefits of ceding islands inhabited almost exclusively by British and French people to a former Spanish colony

                  Considering the French had already ceeded/gave the islands to Spain (which Argentina then inherited from), your comment does not hold weight.

          • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why return or timeshare/coop, why not sovereignty under British support which is happening right now. And which the people staying there demand.