• deegeese
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      LOL. It’s “big solar” that’s eating their lunch.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, that doesn’t scale well at all. Batteries are expensive, dangerous (so lots of safety measures at scale), and consumable, which is why very few places actually try to store energy at any kind of scale.

            Until we have a good, cheap way to store energy, solar will be a supplemental power source to help with peak demand in the daytime. So we’ll need something that’s reliable and inexpensive to provide power the rest of the time. For many areas, that’s coal or gas, but it could be nuclear. If people just accepted that nuclear is safe and effective, costs would come down.

              • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Agreed. If people truly understood just how safe it is, we could make it so much cheaper.

                I’m stoked about mini reactors, which should make remote factories and whatnot far more reasonable.