misk to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoA Florida restaurant chain says boosting pay and offering better benefits helped it end its labor shortagewww.businessinsider.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1518arrow-down14
arrow-up1514arrow-down1external-linkA Florida restaurant chain says boosting pay and offering better benefits helped it end its labor shortagewww.businessinsider.commisk to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squarespittingimage@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34arrow-down2·1 year agoIn other news, water still wet.
minus-squareelectrogamerman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down23·edit-21 year agoWater isnt nor ever was wet. and yes I’m fun at parties
minus-squareEl Barto@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down5·1 year agoCan you pour water onto water? Then yes, water can be wet.
minus-squaregregorum@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·edit-21 year agoThat just makes more water, not wet water. Water cannot give a property to itself (wetness) that it, by definition, can only give to other things.
minus-squareEl Barto@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoDry air can dry air. Wet water can wet water. Checkmate!
minus-squareelectrogamerman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down15·1 year agoBy definition, only solids can get wet, so no, adding water to water doesn’t make it wet.
minus-squaremycatiskai@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·1 year agoSo a frozen cube of water can by your description get wet with the water when put in a glass of said water.
minus-squaregregorum@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoWhat you are describing, is ice, a solid, not simply water, which is a liquid. This changes this scenario.
minus-squareelectrogamerman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down14·1 year agoNo, not really. Water needs to adhere to the surface of the solid and water doesn’t adhere to a cube of ice, so no.
minus-squareAniki 🌱🌿@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·edit-21 year agodeleted by creator
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-21 year agoWater wets on to ice. It’s a verb. For a physical effect. That does happen to water. If you want to be pedantic, be correct.
minus-squareEl Barto@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·edit-21 year agoI’m joking. Calm down, get a good calming wet shower. I hadn’t even downvoted you, and now you made me.
minus-squarespittingimage@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoDid I say wet? I meant to say “water still wets”.
In other news, water still wet.
Water isnt nor ever was wet.
and yes I’m fun at parties
Can you pour water onto water? Then yes, water can be wet.
That just makes more water, not wet water. Water cannot give a property to itself (wetness) that it, by definition, can only give to other things.
Dry air can dry air. Wet water can wet water. Checkmate!
By definition, only solids can get wet, so no, adding water to water doesn’t make it wet.
So a frozen cube of water can by your description get wet with the water when put in a glass of said water.
What you are describing, is ice, a solid, not simply water, which is a liquid. This changes this scenario.
No, not really. Water needs to adhere to the surface of the solid and water doesn’t adhere to a cube of ice, so no.
deleted by creator
Water wets on to ice. It’s a verb. For a physical effect. That does happen to water.
If you want to be pedantic, be correct.
I’m joking. Calm down, get a good calming wet shower.
I hadn’t even downvoted you, and now you made me.
deleted by creator
Oh shit!
I downvoted you both. For balance!
Did I say wet? I meant to say “water still wets”.