I liked NYT headline (A Supernova ‘Destroyed’ Some of Earth’s Ozone for a Few Minutes in 2022) better but it was behind paywall and I don’t want to editorialize titles unless necessary.
Oof my grouchiness was intended for the headline writer - sorry that you caught some of it. It’s fine enough to read a little blurb about GRBs over morning coffee, and this article for the most part was just that. It’s just a shame today’s journalism needs to cram some sort of angle into everything.
I liked NYT headline (A Supernova ‘Destroyed’ Some of Earth’s Ozone for a Few Minutes in 2022) better but it was behind paywall and I don’t want to editorialize titles unless necessary.
Oof my grouchiness was intended for the headline writer - sorry that you caught some of it. It’s fine enough to read a little blurb about GRBs over morning coffee, and this article for the most part was just that. It’s just a shame today’s journalism needs to cram some sort of angle into everything.