• steventhedev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Except it literally does justify attacking the hospital. Black on white, letter and spirit of the law.

    • Zaktor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      No it doesn’t, and you’re a shitty person for thinking that.

      • khalic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Just because you don’t like something doesn’t make it wrong. They’re right about legitimate targets regarding conflict rules

        • Zaktor
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          “Whether it’s ok to bomb a hospital” isn’t a legal question.

          • khalic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            We aren’t discussing if “it’s ok”, we are discussing the Rules of Conflict. War is never ok, but war without rules is even worse

            • Zaktor
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Except it literally does justify attacking the hospital.

              “Justified” and “legal” are two separate judgements. OP wants to conflate them to excuse an unjust act.