Potential dangers of AI expected to be major focus of Wednesday’s much-awaited bilateral meeting on margins of Apec summit in San Francisco.

  • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m curious what they’re actually talking about banning that the article refers to as “AI”. Unless you’re talking about hypothetical future tech or the flavor of the week like LLMs or stable diffusion, it’s pretty much a meaningless term.

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hopefully it’s an entire blanket ban on target decisions. AI has a ton of uses, especially if dumb LLM stuff is included. Human-groomed algorithms won’t be keeping up. It’ll be necessary to use them, but they shouldn’t ever decide who gets boomboomed.

    • Patch@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh dear god I hope nobody was planning on giving ChatGPT nuclear bombs.

    • player2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think that is more like an advanced auto pilot which can also steer missiles to their target but only if fired by the human. The OP article says they’re banning AI from making the decision to fire the weapon.

  • webghost0101
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/9c09884e-a0e3-41ca-bf91-8d90e79ceac3.jpeg

    Its cheaper, easier and still leaves room for ai guided ammunition