The New York State Board of Elections is opting to wait for the courts to rule on the eligibility of former President Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign, signaling that the board would be open to taking his name off state ballots.

In a November 3 letter, the NYSBOE informed U.S. District Judge Glenn Suddaby that the state agency is taking “no position” in the matter of Trump’s candidacy and that it will “abide by any orders of judgements of the court.”

  • logicbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The best case scenario for everybody (except maybe Trump) is if Trump was removed from the primary ballots in every state.

    Trump doesn’t want to do the job. He didn’t even try to do the job the last time he had it. At this point, his main reason for running is to stay out of prison.

      • Tedesche@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Only because he now realizes it’s possible. I think his main reason is that he thinks losing anything makes him weak and he wants to prove he’s not weak. Trump has only ever really cared about one thing: his image. Even his personal freedom and money come second to that, I’d bet.

      • logicbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Strange legacy to become a dictator an such an advanced age that you’ll inevitably die soon after. There’s no guarantee that even if Trump is elected in 2024 that he’d make it to 2028, since he’s unusually unhealthy.

    • Phlogiston@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know that there is a best case for “everybody” at this point.

      If Trump is blocked from running we will be hearing from his cult for the rest of time - and they will turn around and try to do this to others as payback (like they are doing with impeachment).

      If Trump dies of a heart attack he becomes a martyr.

      I think the best case is that he looses the primary. This might keep the Rs together as a party (sigh) but at least it will be their choice and maybe we can all move forward from there.

      If Trump looses on the general we have another round of sore losers whining and trying to destroy democracy some more. Regardless of how that fight goes every day of it diminishes the country and boost in intensity would be bad.

      If he wins the general election the country is SO very fucked — welcome to your new authoritarian apartheid anti-freedom etc state. At least that is their stated goal and it’s gonna be a horrible country damaging battle.

      All of this is Rs and Trumps (MAGAs) fault. And they’re continuing to take the initiatives. I don’t have a broad strategy in mind so I’m ok with fighting them at each of these levels.

      • logicbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If Trump is blocked from running we will be hearing from his cult for the rest of time - and they will turn around and try to do this to others as payback (like they are doing with impeachment).

        Yes, I think this is the best case scenario. The 14th Amendment is actually upheld. One of the other GOP candidates get to win the primary. This is their best outcome. The MAGA public gets to continue to whine and complain, which is clearly what they want more than anything. The Democrats get to win the election over the demoralized MAGA crowd. And everybody, whether MAGA or sane, gets to benefit from having competent politicians running the federal government.

        I think the best case is that he looses the primary.

        Yes, it is almost the same as my best case. The big difference to me, and I think this is important, is that the US Constitution is actually followed in my best case scenario.

        A lot of liberals think the best case scenario is for Trump to lose in the general election. This seems like the third best outcome to me.

        I agree with you that we absolutely don’t want Trump to die. I think that would be a worst case scenario. I actually think that the best overall scenario (not just talking about the election now) is if the Dems keep the WH and Senate, and take over the House, however that happens, and that Trump lives quite a long time. Because Trump has been amazing at reducing the number of young people who become Republican. The longer he’s alive, but out of power, the weaker the GOP becomes, long term.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        If Trump is blocked from running we will be hearing from his cult for the rest of time

        It doesn’t matter what happens we will be hearing from them for the rest of time.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No shit. Idk how op can even pretend it’s a factor.
          They can’t do anything except vote. Get over them.

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think him dying from a heart attack will not make him a martyr. He eats like shit and is in poor shape. Not everyone would believe it, but not so many that would be a problem. Like the dude is in the age bracket where it could happen and not be too surprising.

        • Phlogiston@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think you underestimate his how many would believe. I don’t think MAGA types care about facts or health related statistics — all of which are signs of the liberal elite. Given the chance I think they’d make a martyr out of him just for spite.

          • GladiusB@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh I don’t underestimate them. However I don’t think they will convince their children. Thus martyrism would be not possible for me.

  • Wenchette@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I predict he will ultimately not be removed from any ballot in any state, even if the Supreme Court has to intervene.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the least newsworthy article ever. Literally everyone would abide by a court order to remove him or otherwise abide by the laws to include him if he meets the qualifications.

  • Hedup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does this really matter? Are not the swing states the ones that actually decide the president?

    • nicetriangle@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would likely hurt republican down ballot candidates as presumably a lot of trump voters that would have gone straight ticket will just skip the vote altogether.

      • Kale@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think NY splits electoral votes. To get any NY electoral votes, he’d have to carry the whole state.

        Will this leave him off the ballot for the primary? He is expected to win the primary and this will pump the numbers for another GOP candidate. If enough states do this, it could give the convention the cover to select someone else.

  • kingshrubb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It won’t make much of a difference if only states that would vote Democrat anyway take him off the ballot.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    In a November 3 letter, the NYSBOE informed U.S. District Judge Glenn Suddaby that the state agency is taking “no position” in the matter of Trump’s candidacy and that it will “abide by any orders of judgements of the court.”

    The lawsuit challenging Trump’s candidacy in New York is one of 27 that have been filed across the country by John Anthony Castro, a long-shot presidential candidate who argues Trump should be disqualified from running for president under the 14th Amendment because of his role in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

    The constitutional clause in question bars individuals from holding public office if they have “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” against the United States.

    “The evidence shows that Castro has not campaigned in New Hampshire or elsewhere,” said U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Laplante.

    On Wednesday, the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled against a separate petition to keep Trump off the state’s primary ballot, while leaving the door open for another challenge should the former president eventually become the Republican nominee in the general election.

    “There is no state statute that prohibits a major political party from placing on the presidential nomination primary ballot, or sending delegates to the national convention supporting, a candidate who is ineligible to hold office,” the ruling states, adding that “because there is no error to correct here as to the presidential nomination primary…the petition must be dismissed.”


    The original article contains 501 words, the summary contains 233 words. Saved 53%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Uniquitous@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As well they should. Not that he had any chance of winning there anyway, but it’s the right thing to do regardless.

  • crystalmerchant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is so bad. Like, guys, you understand this opens a Pandora’s box of Republicans attempting to remove Dems from ballots in every election you can think of? Do you really want to create this new norm?

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What in the hell are you talking about? Trump incited an insurrection to disrupt the peaceful transition of power. The bar to remove anyone from the ballot is ridiculously high, and if a Democrat does the same, they should absolutely be prevented from running.

      • Tedesche@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You seem to think Republicans will give a damn about laws and refrain from doing this vindictively, solely for political points and on the off chance that it might work with the right judge.

        They will not.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You seem to think they will have that thing we have now called a fuckton of evidence. They don’t. Just like the election challenges that actually went before judges it will fall on its face if the GOP tries this with no proof. The only place that works is on TV or soc.media.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You think Republicans give a fuck about precedent? Have you not been paying attention?

      Dems need to learn to start preemptively striking and never showing any mercy if we want to have any hope of righting the ship.