Israeli PM said to have turned down proposal in early talks and continues to take tough line

  • jesseaccountname@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    He just wants genocide. It’s infuriating seeing world leaders pretend they don’t get that so they can get what they want out of Palestinian deaths.

      • Land_Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey, getting having a casus belli that can be passed around to buy you time to bomb a city long enough before someone intervenes, especially if you can’t singlehandedly deter many of the other armies to leave you alone, is a rare opportunity for small fish warmongers.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      casus belli

      casus belli /kā″səs bĕl′ī, kä″səs bĕl′ē/

      noun

      • An act or event that provokes or is used to justify war.

      • A matter or occasion of war; an excuse or a reason for declaring war: as, the right of search claimed by Great Britain constituted a casus belli in 1812.

      • An act seen as justifying or causing a war.

      (The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition)

  • deegeese
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bibi doesn’t want peace, he wants genocide.

      • ???@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m amazed this got downvoted lol like just have a laugh and move on with your life

      • Quokka@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        His first name is Benjamin, his family had other Benjamin’s, they nicknamed him Bibi.

    • keardap@lemmy.selfhost.quest
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are so clueless about Israel’s politics. Bibi has been giving Hamas money, sent by Qatar, for years. Bibi love the Hamas, they want to exterminate all Israelis, they (and Iran) are his strawman to scare people to vote for him.

      • deegeese
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What do you think I was saying? Of course he loves Hamas, they give him carte blanche to bomb Gaza.

        • keardap@lemmy.selfhost.quest
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Bibi isn’t a genocidal maniac. He is a corrupted polition, his only agenda now is going to jail for his crimes. He is populist, he need an enemy, if he will murder every Palestinian he lose a strawman.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, color me surprised… he’s seemed so interested in a peaceful resolution.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      He doesn’t give a shit about hostages.

      If he did, they wouldn’t be blowing up all of Gaza.

      If any die from IDF strikes, he’ll just say that Hamas killed them and use their deaths to justify more bombings.

      • Therealgoodjanet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s right. So far 60 hostages have gone missing due to Israeli strikes. So, yeah. They don’t give a single shit.

    • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dude had a chance to stop the whole thing in its tracks and didn’t take it.

      This has always been about taking the land.

      • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hamas has stated they will repeat attacks like Oct 7th until all Israel is wiped out, and you think they will honour a ceasefire and actually accept peace?

        Hamas only wants a ceasefire so they can regroup and rearm before attacking Israel again.

  • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    All he cares about is escalation. The United States needs to ditch Israel before they get us attacked too.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, he’s seeing the opportunity to finally kick the Palestinians out.

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Before? Dude, radical islamic extremists have been calling us “the great Satan” for decades lol

      They hate us for our support of Israel and thousands of people have already died because of it.

      • burchalka@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nope, radical islamists hate US and anything that stands between them and dar-al-islam (world of Islam)…

  • shatal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    At this point he doesn’t have a choice. Hamas offered to release about a dozen hostages for a ceasefire.

    The Israelis repeatedly declared that there won’t be any ceasefire without the release of all the hostages.

    If he accepts anything else he’s most likely to loose all control.

  • ShroOmeric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    He’ll rather kill them all with his own hands rather than stop the war. The moment genocide is over he’s next in line to get fucked. So long hostages. This is what you get for electing sociopaths I guess.

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course he did.

    The hostages are much more valuable to Israel in captivity, so they can continually exploit them for genocidal justifications.

    • Genericusername@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is simply not true.

      There were talks about up to 15 hostages, of 239 in demand for 4 days of ceasefire. Hamas needs this ceasefire desperately to regroup and assess the damages. The chaos now serves Israel well and apparently it puts much more pressure on Hamas. The ground invasion proves very effective. Maybe as Hamas becomes more desperate the “price” for the hostages will drop. Alternatively, if Israel will allow them to regroup, the war will take significantly more time because it will be much harder to eradicate them. Maybe the Israelis know where the hostages are held and after a ceasefire the hostages will be transferred to a different hideout, or smuggled via the tunnels to Egypt and from there to who knows where.

      • homura1650@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Neutral and Israel alligned countries have been calling for a humanatarian pause on purely humanitarian grounds. Even if you don’t care about the hostages, that Hamas was willing to offer them means that they had an interest in such a pause as well; making Israel the only obstacle to it happening. That is to say, the severity of the humanitarian disaster in Gaza is squarly on Israel’s shoulders. The most charitable reading of the situation is that they have determined that the tactical advantage of blocking a humanitarian pause outways the civilian lives they put at risk by doing so.

        • ???@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          And even that charitable reading means they are committing collective punishment.

      • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not about the hostages any more. They are the excuse Israel needs to eradicate a whole country.

        • Genericusername@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Israel cares a whole lot about its hostages. Evidence for that are the prices they were willing to pay in the past.

          But sure, let’s go with your logic. Why can’t Israel just go carpet-bombing the crowded part in the south of the Gaza strip that all the refugees fled to? It would be a very effective way to eradicate them all. They are so crowded in such a small area that it’s possible to kill a couple hundred thousands in a single day. Wow, Israel has a lot to learn on how to ethnically cleanse a region.

        • fosforus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did you just completely ignore what Genericusername wrote and decide to reply to him anyway?

      • ???@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The price of Hamas not “regrouping” is not worth committing genocide for.

  • BeautifulMind ♾️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course he doesn’t want to de-escalate the situation.

    If he did that, things might calm down and fewer people will vote based on his promises of being strong on security. Also if he did that, his hard-right backers (who need a hot conflict to keep taking Palestinian land politically acceptable) will attack him for being ‘soft’ on security.

    The logic of it all is genocide of course, but Bibi wants that if the alternative is him being out of office and back in court defending himself against corruption charges.

    • ahornsirup
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which is a very important distinction that people here seem to overlook. If you give in to a terrorist’s and hostage taker’s demands you’re inviting more terrorism and hostage-taking because it worked.

        • mwguy@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly, at this point there aren’t any other options. Because the last major conflict in the region was 5 years ago in 2018, there was a real feeling around the world that Hamas/Gaza had “turned a corner” and was open to living in peace with its neighbors. That’s why you had seen rising calls from the West, even the US, calling for a freeze on new settlements in the West Bank. And there was a real hope that maybe covid had “reset” the expectations of both sides in the same way that the end of the Cold War seemingly had.

          But it looks like Hamas had no intention of that. Instead they unleashed an attack and had five years of rocket build up behind it instead of the normal two. At this point I don’t know how many more times we need to Hamas the show that it’s uninterested and even the ideal concept of peace. Even Hezbollah, in southern Lebanon, a fellow terrorist organization; seems to have the ability to respect a border with Israel. So at this point yes tearing him off down even with the understanding that a new terrorist like organization might take its place is preferable to the status quo. Because there is a reasonable chance that even a new terrorist organization could respect a border, and not attack its neighbors. And honestly if a Taliban-esque group ends up taking over it probably be a better outcome for the day-to-day of Gazans. That’s f***** up as that is.

          • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Honestly all this will do is infuriate more Gazans who may have lost everything, and will want vengeance. Continuity the cycle. I get Hamas is an issue but making Gazans suffer for it doesn’t help anyone.

            • mwguy@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              How much more angry can they get? Like they’re angry enough to behead children, and cheer raped corpses through their streets. What more do they have to offer?

              • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I can’t believe I have to say this, but hamas ≠ Palestinians, Just like Israel’s government ≠ Jewish people.

                • mwguy@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Hamas didn’t cheer those corpses, common Palestinians did. There’s extensive polling in the region and Hamas enjoys widespread support. It’s believed that if elections happened today in the West Bank that Hamas would win.

                  While Hamas might not represent the Palestinian diaspora, they definitely represent the Palestinians located in the Gaza Strip.

    • ???@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      And yet nowhere did anyone claim otherswise 😕 nor does it improve the situation or change how Bibi is viewed now

      (judging by how you phrased this comment)

        • ???@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The headline says nothing about the number nor implies anything.

          This is why you need to read the rest of an article.

          • mwguy@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The hostages are a group that’s assumed to be complete. That’s like if someone stole your tires off your car and offered to give “your tires” back to you but only 2 of the 4. People assume they offered all the tires if the headline doesn’t say otherwise.

            If you include the partial hostage release, it essentially robs the story as it’s clear why you wouldn’t do a deal for some of the hostages. Making any deal for some of the hostages is stupid.

            • ???@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I think this is dumb. The title didn’t say all hostages. The article didn’t say all hostages. You invented this in your own head then decided to build an argument around it.

              • mwguy@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean future articles covering it have said things like “Ceasefire for $x hostages rejected” for exactly this reason.

                • ???@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Sure but your case is still weak and honestly not even there.

  • BOMBS@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think Netanyahu has a similar look about his eyes as Putin? It’s like they’re monsters inside and are communicating how little empathy and concerns for others they have inside, almost as a warning. Anyone else feel the same thing?

    • purplexed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s the military training plus a little extra sociopath on the side.

  • aidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    One source with knowledge of the talks, which slowed after the Israeli ground invasion, said a central point of discussion was a demand by the Israeli side for Hamas to provide a full list specifying the name and details of each person held in Gaza. The Israeli side was unwilling to cease bombardments without receiving this list.

    Hamas responded that it was unable to provide the list without a pause in the fighting, as the estimated 240 hostages were held by a number of different groups in places across Gaza. That suggested even Hamas leaders do not know for sure how many people are held captive, their locations or the number who have survived the bombardments.

    Another source said Hamas originally demanded prisoner exchanges, fuel and other supplies in return for the hostages, but these demands were dropped in favour of a halt to the airstrikes alone.

    “Each time the Israeli counter-demand got harder,” the source said. Members of Hamas have previously said they took hostages in order to exchange them for the thousands of Palestinian prisoners held in Israeli jails.

    Sources briefed on the talks told Reuters that the group discussed allowing small amounts of fuel into Gaza for humanitarian purposes, which Israel has so far refused, as well as the deal to free a small number of hostages in exchange for a ceasefire of one or two days. The outcome of the talks, however, remained unclear.

    It sounds like these sources may be members of Hamas’ negotiating team, which I don’t exactly know that that’s a reliable source.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It doesnt sound like complete BS that Hamas probably doesnt know the exact number, names and placement of hostages at the moment. They probably have a good idea but no definite list.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    When Putin was invading Ukraine everyone was calling for the Russians to just kill Putin. When Hamas invaded everyone was calling for the Palestinians to kill Hamas themselves.

    Awfully silent these days though now israel is the party committing war crimes.

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Telling Palestinians to kill Hamas leaders is useless because the top Hamas leaders are actually living abroad, unlike Putin who stay cooped in Russia.

      • fosforus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        For practical purposes, Putin is pretty much as safe as the Hamas leaders.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right I should have clarified. European and Americans which have always yelled that violence against politicians is never justified did a 180 on their morals when they didn’t like someone.

    • fosforus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You don’t see the logical pattern here? This is about being against fascists like Putin and Hamas. Nobody is claiming that our side is filled with lawful good angels, only that the other side is mostly assholes whose main goal is to fuck everything up. Therefore it should be obvious who to root for.

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hamas aren’t fascist. They are freedom fighters defending their land. Are Ukrainians fascist to you?

        • fosforus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Hamas aren’t fascist.

          They are objectively by definition fascist, and as you defend them, you are defending fascists. You should be deeply ashamed of yourself.

          Are Ukrainians fascist to you?

          No. What kind of a fucked up question is that?

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Zelensky isn’t holding elections because they’re at war defending against invaders. According to you he is a fascist right?

        • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hamas aren’t fascist

          Hahahaha, hole hell that’s the dumbest shit I’ve heard in ages. Thanks for the laugh.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Globally, we’re going to need to develop approaches for de-radicalizing large groups of people. Even if we can start on the direction towards peace in this situation, both the Israeli and some segments of Palestinian people seem radicalized to the point of no return, where no true solutions is even possible. I see the same thing in the US with whatever tf you want to call the Republican party. They’re over the cliff. No pulling them back. Yet we need a way to de-radicalize these people otherwise there is no path forward.

    • Flag@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You dont have to leave Israel and palestine to find more groups. Have you seen what kinds of people bibi is courting to stay in power? Ultra-orthodox far right netters who are publically asking for a cleansed ethno-state.