• parascent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 year ago

    The babies died making average age less. Doesn’t mean those who got to adulthood lived to that age only.

    • KredeSeraf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah. If you made it past 10 or so you’d probably live to at least 50, with 60-70 not being common but also far from rare. All those dying kids and babies really bring down the average.

      • chaorace@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Let’s not get too crazy. There’s a 15 year period where young men tend to get injured and young women tend to give birth that acts as a major filter. If you plotted death rates on a graph it would look like a trident – that’s life without antibiotics.

        It’s certainly true that elderly were not a rare sight, but those elderly who could be found were almost universally hardy of constitution or talented at avoiding danger. Quite literally the end of the bell curve.

      • Torvum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Family having like 13 kids, only 5 maybe making it to teen age, daughter dies in childbirth, 4 kids to 50 type beat.

        Population graph after penicillin is very telling