• SchizoDenji@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand how you’ve equated security cameras in a PUBLIC PLACE as “less privacy”.

      What do you want privacy for in a public place?

      • mulcahey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think the issue is “I want to do illegal things in public without consequence.” It’s more, “I don’t trust the mechanisms of enforcement to use this power justly.”

        For example: Radio City Music Hall used facial recognition tech to identify and ban a lawyer whose firm was suing them. She wasn’t even working the case. RCMH just issued a blanket ban. It’s abusive.

        And there are other risks. Stalking is a huge one. (Some creep takes your pic at the supermarket and now you spend a year of your life getting creepy messages and feeling unsafe everywhere you go.) Or there’s the risk that people who participate in lawful protest will face retribution or punishment by corrupt law enforcement.

        Kashmir Hill has a great book out about this now. You can read an interview with her here.

        • SchizoDenji@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          No dude, I have plenty to hide. Just nothing that I do in a public place though. Wonder when was the last time you were at one of them.

      • Calavera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they have facial tracking then they can basically keep track of everywhere you go

          • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            stay

            stay

            stay

            This implies they’re a utopia and not a rich-people-only dystopia.

            Is the bigger picture murdering people consuming cannabis?

              • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Murder is acceptable if petty thefts are reduced? So the worth of a human life is roughly $200 - $2000, or the worth of a laptop?

                If the only way to stop petty thefts is murder, petty theft cannot be prevented ethically.

                  • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Sending the message that money is more important than the lives of people, alright.

                    I’m happy to live in a country where this kind of ““justice”” system is impossible to implement legally.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                The death penalty for drugs is a worthy sacrifice considering the extremely positive societal outcome.

                “It’s good that we kill someone for smoking a joint because no one stole my laptop!” You have fucked up priorities.