Not a big budget in mind, this is what I am looking at.
Acer Nitro KG272 S3 27" FHD VA 180Hz
The price in AUD, which is $127 USD before tax.
I am currently using a 3050 laptop / 5600H connected to my 1080p/60hz Acer from 2014. What I like about this monitor is it looks exactly the same and is the same size, it will be swapped with the existing VESA mount.
I cannot find any official documentation, some websites don’t list it as HDR10 at all, I also find that regional variants can be very different. Some information shows this to be IPS, but I also can’t find that out for sure, I also don’t understand if that would be better/worse for high refresh rate. I am also on the assumption that 180Hz is really 165Hz with a possible OC I won’t be using.
I will be playing at 1080p and can handle my games at 120+, the HDR10 will be a boost. I had thought that HDR400 was the dodgy spec, but now I am reading negative remarks about anything below HDR600, I thought HDR10 was genuine 10bit.
This is the best price in my regional stores and can be picked up locally.
In the listing, it specifies 250 cd/m² which I assume is important.
You must log in or register to comment.
I thought HDR10 was genuine 10bit
Bit depth isn’t what makes something hdr. You can have 10 bit sdr too. Wide color gamut is what makes hdr ‘pop’, and larger bit depth compensates the color precision loss due to the wider gamut. Higher peak brightness increases the contrast and technically the number of colors.
Acer seems to have made some naming fuckery with your monitor, as kg272 and kg272s3 have different specs. That must be why you found conflicting information. I found this listing of your model: https://www.amazon.de/-/en/Nitro-KG272S3-Monitor-FreeSync-Premium/dp/B0C28RM88F
And it says it does have hdr10 support but its srgb coverage is only 95%. With that srgb coverage I doubt it can actually produce the extra colors in a wider gamut, even if it accepts an hdr signal. I don’t think you’ll have a good hdr experience with this monitor.
I suggest you look into monitors that actually list their dci-p coverage and pick one with >85% coverage. Higher peak brightness is always better and will produce better images but I disagree with the sentiment that low brightness hdr isn’t worth it. If higher brightness monitors aren’t in your budget you’ll still get a better than sdr image with a low brightness, wide gamut display.
Edit: same goes for deeper blacks via VA, oled panels or local dimming. They’ll make more of a difference than brighter highlights and also be noticeable in sdr but still aren’t as impactful as the punchier colors of a wider gamut. If you need to pick between specs, color coverage > blacks > highlights > bit depth.
The laptop is a Dell G15 5515 Ryzen Edition 3050-4GB | 5600H | 16GB 3200Mhz
The laptop has a 120Hz panel which is okay, but too small and awkward, I generally play on my mechanical keyboard in front of the monitor for better neck/joint support. I am happy with my overall setup, I would just like a full 120+ on the monitor and I have been watching HDR content scaled down via Plex to 8bit.
you might want to check the exact laptop model’s specs. Occasionally the display outputs are limited to 60 Hz for silly reasons (generally them being wired to the igpu instead of the stronger nvidia gpu).
At least some years ago this seemed to be a fairly common thing over at pcmr sub.
Nothing that lacks local dimming can do true HDR. VA and IPS are mutually exclusive, so find out which one it is. VA can have more smearing, but deeper blacks. It can also be tuned to be faster, but then it loses the contrast benefits
Anyway, ignore any HDR listing at this price. If you want any noticable HDR, save up for an OLED or QD-OLED monitor, they cost about $1000 these days
The OC is usually worth it if you use the overdrive mode that doesn’t cause ghosting. You need to find a review that shows how much overshoot it has at each overdrive mode, it’s often best to only have a slight overdrive instead of maxing it.
You can test how overdrive looks like in https://testufo.com
