• philpo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well considering that the US nuclear launch codes were just zeros for a while, it just might be realistic.

      • philpo@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Unless someone sends the suit with the codes in it to the Chinese dry cleaners…again…and again.

        • tal@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Launch codes aren’t to block China from authorizing a launch. They’re there to keep someone in the military from doing a launch without authorization. China is probably one of the parties who least wants said codes leaking.

          If you have a couple hundred people who can start a nuclear war, that war becomes a whole lot more likely than if only one can.

          From China’s standpoint, the next best number of people who can launch against them after 0 is 1.

          The British used bicycle keys on their nuclear bombs.

          http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7097101.stm

          As people learned around that time, a really great way to bypass bicycle locks is with a ballpoint pen.

          https://www.wired.com/2004/09/twist-a-pen-open-a-lock/

          That was aimed more at keeping honest people honest.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well considering that the US nuclear launch codes were just zeros for a while

      I’ve seen some statements that this was apocryphal.

      https://foreignpolicy.com/2014/01/21/air-force-swears-our-nuke-launch-code-was-never-00000000/

      Though you could argue – since there was a point in time prior to PALs where there was no authorization system at all – that a very functionally-similar state existed prior to the implementation of those codes.