• PugJesus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Their whole socioeconomic status is a result of the crimes of their ancestors.

    So, ancestral guilt.

    • young_broccoli@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its not just “ancestral guilt”. Like I said : “they have kept the loot and are still profiting from it”, And by loot I dont mean only valuable goods but power too. They still benefit from the power imbalance between countries that was created during colonialism. Just look at the world economy and the dynamic between the “economic south” and “economic north”

      They are not guilty of colonialism “per se” but they are guilty of perpetuating, and using, the inequality and oppression that colonialism was built on for their own benefit.

      • PugJesus@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, do you mind telling me whose socioeconomic status isn’t a result of the crimes of their ancestors?

          • PugJesus@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Many descendants of slaves and many poor people benefit from the atrocities of their ancestors, simply to a lesser degree. Short of being part of a completely dispossessed people isolated from broader society, we are all where we are due to the atrocities of our ancestors.

          • GreenM@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Poor people or slaves could have rich ancestors who enslaved others as well though, single lost war in the medieval Africa could meant rich slaver becoming the slave .