• crawley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very informative but you see, science doesn’t convince the anti-science crowd, pretty much by definition.

      • Muun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yup, but if I’m talking to someone who doesn’t believe in man-made climate change and I show them the xkcd and answer their obvious follow-up question about how we know past temperature, and they STILL don’t want to listen to me… well then I know I can never talk to that person again. :)

      • jabathekek
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        anti-science crowd

        Too bad the anti-science crowd are our elected officials. ༎ຶ‿༎ຶ

    • Spzi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can already hear the anti-man-made-climate-change crowd shrieking…

      https://skepticalscience.com/

      Generally a good source for this use case. You can sort by popular arguments or arguments by type, and for many answers choose from different detail levels, sometimes even languages.

      I didn’t find your specific question in their catalogue of answers, but they have a blog post about that topic: https://skepticalscience.com/two-centuries-climate-science-3.html

    • Rubanski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is also that group that says it will get warmer naturally, by whatever solar flare etc bullshit ever. So business as usual, can’t change the course anyway so I will buy a second SUV

    • SamirCasino@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s good to ask the question.

      The problem is when they refuse to accept the answer.