Multiple members emerged from the House GOP’s speaker forum on Tuesday saying they don’t see either candidate being any closer to having the votes needed to secure the gavel on the floor.

Driving the news: “No one is close to 217,” Rep. Kat Cammack (R-Fla.) said after Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La) and Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) pitched members on why they believe they should be the next speaker.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol is this supposed to be a surprise? They had to vote 15 different times to get their “best” choice just a few months ago. Were they expecting this was somehow going to be easier?

    What truly blows my mind is that our government was designed with compromise in mind, but Republicans drank the New Gingrich Koolaid so hard that the idea of compromise has become political suicide for them. I’m hoping that this situation finally makes them realize that a 9 seat majority isn’t exactly a mandate from God, and that they need to work across political lines to govern.

    I’m too much of a realist to expect that to happen though. I don’t believe the modern GOP has any interest in governing.

    • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      What truly blows my mind is that our government was designed with compromise in mind, but Republicans drank the New Gingrich Koolaid so hard that the idea of compromise has become political suicide for them.

      Kevin McCarthy explicitly said that they know the government was designed with compromise, but they don’t want to, because they’re in the majority and therefore should be able to do whatever they want.

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t disagree, but want to add that the beauty of this clusterfuck is that they’re so damn selfish that they even lack the ability to get anything done even with the majority.

        Like…you literally have the votes for whatever you wanna do, all you have to do is agree amongst yourselves, and they can’t even manage that. There’s no “we”. Even though “they” have the majority, they really don’t, since a majority doesn’t mean anything if you can’t organize your party.

        Of course all of this completely ignores the other 200 plus members of the House, but it’s just plain beyond the realm of possibility to even imagine a world where the GOP centrists, sick of the stupidity from the MAGA wing, lean over the aisle and go, “Okay we’re sick of trying to appease them. What would it take to get a dozen of you guys to sign off on a piece of legislation?”

        And the only reason that’s unthinkable is because the entire party is just as pigheaded as Gaetz, they’re just less extreme in their positions and less loudmouthed about it.

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      New Gingrich Koolaid

      Damn them for changing the formula. BRING BACK OLD GINGRICH KOOLAID

      • jballs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Apparently my phone’s autocorrect refuses to acknowledge that a loving mother would ever name their child Newt.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Back in the day, Ronald Reagan talked about ‘The Big Tent’ and how GOPs shouldn’t slash each other.

      Of course, Reagan himself happily backstabbed Gerald Ford by demanding Ford keep the Panama Canal…