In these uncertain and divisive times, we appreciate Anthropic offering support to the Blender project in the form of a Patron-level membership. This enables the Blender team to keep pursuing projects independently, and to focus on building tools for artists and creators.

Francesco Siddi, CEO at Blender

  • Jake Farm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    Are non-profits even allowed to refuse donations?

  • supersquirrel
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Really disappointed by this, this will not be good for Blender.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Really curious why you would say that. Was Anthropic given something in exchange?

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          There needs to be some reason for it to be worrying, and I’m not seeing it. So what is it?

          • supersquirrel
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago
            1. The mindset of AI obsessed CEOs and tech people is toxic towards progress in any meaningful sense, having Anthropic anywhere near Blender is an awful idea for Blender’s competency and power as a software since AI people are universally all bullshitters.

            2. Anthropic is NOT PROFITABLE, what is Anthropic sponsoring Blender with? Even if I didn’t think Anthropic was a bunch of scammers that you don’t want to associate with they don’t even have anything to give, Anthropic IS NOT PROFITABLE AND HAS NO CLEAR ROUTE TO BEING PROFITABLE.

            3. The distraction of building stupid AI capabilities into Blender is a massive waste of time that will suck up more and more development time if the culture of Anthropic is allowed to degrade the Blender Community. I am learning Blender so I CAN USE IT not tell a stupid, shitty broken glitchy AI to try to cobble together something I want.

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              22 hours ago

              The mindset of AI obsessed CEOs and tech people is toxic towards progress in any meaningful sense

              Oh so the CEO is being given control over the direction of the project?

              Anthropic is NOT PROFITABLE

              Oh so when Anthropic starts to go under they’re going to get their money back?

              The distraction of building stupid AI capabilities into Blender

              What AI capabilities are being built into Blender?

              E: No answers were provided. Just downvote and move on, I suppose.

    • TheV2@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      If we look at only the Blender Development Fund, the list of the corporate patrons include Meta, Google, Nvidia and even Adobe. In general, this is the situation for a lot of FOSS projects. If Anthropic as a Blender patron is bad news, then things were never good in the first place.

      In my opinion, whether it’s good or bad, it is a compromise that we rely on.

    • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      You’d think so, but from what I’ve personally heard at least… Anthropic seems to mostly be doing right by the community with their contributions like this. I could be falling for the propaganda, but guys are even backing groups pushing for stronger AI guardrails and oversight.

        • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          The media is pushing that as a solid theory and it’s not crazy. What’s bad for openai is good for anthropic / etc, but there are a lot of places they could be putting that money that would benefit them more directly.

        • altphoto@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Too late, I have an AI running on a server at home. I love it like that… My know it all bitch. The other way around with only a handful of companies holding all the knowledge is totally crazy.