Over 100 Israelis have died and more than 900 were injured after rockets were fired from Gaza by Hamas militants, Israeli officials said Saturday.

The Palestinian Health Ministry said 198 were killed in Gaza and at least 1,610 were injured Saturday in retaliatory attacks from Israel.

“We are at war. We will win,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Saturday.

The Israeli Defense Forces earlier declared “a state of alert for war,” according to a statement issued by the IDF.

“Over the past hour, the Hamas terrorist organization launched massive barrages of rockets from Gaza into Israel, and its terrorist operatives have infiltrated into Israel in a number of different locations in the south,” the IDF said early Saturday.

  • halfempty@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    176
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    No good guys here. Hamas doesn’t seem to serve the Palestinians, they serve their own Jihadist agenda. Isreal remains a fascist apartheid regime which has been systematically killing all Palestinians in a genocide for decades.

        • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Gaza is a massive prison and they don’t have anything to loose anymore. Will Israel become the exterminator? We will see.

      • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        1 year ago

        Murder of civilians celebrated by the whole of their society is not justified by reaction. I suggest you look at some other societies which react to genocidal crimes, for some reference. Most of them don’t do that.

        Nah, this was the case with Palestinian Arabs all along. Since their “throw all Jews into the sea” till now.

        • V H@lemmy.stad.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          ANC bombed civilians and their attacks were celebrated by many. The IRA did, and were celebrated by many. ETA did, and were celebrated by many. It is common, and suggesting it’s unique to Palestinians is pure racism.

          EDIT: Ah, looked at one of your other comments that were equally awful. Block incoming.

          • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think you know the difference between collateral damage and massacre. Or maybe you know that, just pretend to be a moron. I can accept your pretense, but not your point.

            • drstrange@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Are you suggesting it is not true that the groups he mentioned intentionally targeted civilians?

              Perhaps you’re not old enough to remember the ANC bombing campaign against Wimpy restaurants, mainly timed to go off during lunchtime to maximise damage.

              The Church Street bombing it’s reasonable to argue collateral damage for, but a burger chain doesn’t strike me as a legitimate military or government target you can play the “collateral damage” game with.

              Maybe it was just ignorance of history that made you single out Palestinians.

              • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                OK. I don’t think IRA and ANC had that nasty habit of raping their victims and parading their mutilated bodies, or lynching them, and in general these were not genocidal in ideology while Hamas is. Is that sufficiently clear for you to comprehend?

                FFS, I’m Armenian and I could give Israel another try at existing after turning it into radioactive ash, but defending these animals is just vile.

                • drstrange@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  And now you’re making an entirely different point and evading addressing the gross generalization you made where you blamed not just Hamas but all Palestinians for the crimes of some and implied they were uniquely bad. At this point I agree with the other person who blocked you.

                  • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    where you blamed not just Hamas but all Palestinians

                    No, I was only talking about Hamas at every point in this thread.

                    At this point I agree with the other person who blocked you.

                    Because you have no other weapon in this conversation.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hamas gave being legitimate a try. Israel blocked their accession in the West Bank after they won the election. They were never given a chance to serve Palestinians.

      • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wouldn’t really expect them to idly stand by and let an organization whose charter is essentially “Death to Israel, death to all Jews” to come into power

        There cannot be a peaceful coexistence between Israel and Hamas because (and their charter has a section explicitly devoted to this) Hamas does not want it, when they talk of “ending the occupation”, they don’t just mean of Palestine

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Funny thing. If we used that logic then we’d all be dead. No war would ever end but with the complete annihilation of the loser and with nukes that means everyone.

          Furthermore, PR line or not, Hamas was elected. Interfering to stop them from taking power is an act of war itself. Justify it how you want but Israel hasn’t given peace a chance in a long time.

          • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            When one side very explicitly states “there will be no peace, we will keep fighting until one of us is completely wiped out”, I struggle to see why the world should not oblige, and while the state of Israel is definitely not perfect it’s not very difficult for me lean towards the side that’s still managing to perform roof knocking over the complete and utter barbarism displayed by the Hamas terrorists over the fast few days

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That’s funny because Israel has been violating international law and the laws of war for decades. Roof Knocking doesn’t absolve them of using Israeli law in occupied areas, shooting medical personal at unarmed protests, bombing UN facilities, or using White Phosphorus shells that airburst.

              I’m not saying Hamas is fighting clean. I’m saying PR doesn’t make policy.

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hamas sets up military operations in a civilian building by force - the civilians have no say in this and get killed if they protest Hamas then uses that building to launch rockets, store ammunition, communication stations How the fuck should Israel proceed to neutralize those sites? Because what they do is:

      “Roof knocking”: Hitting the building’s roof with a small explosive to announce that it will fall in 15 minutes (see video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teevWpXlRZY example from yesterday) Automatic SMS and phone calls impacted areas warning and urging to evacuate Precision strikes that make the building fall vertically with minimal damage to the areas As a result, civilians (and potentially military personnel) are given a chance to evacuate while ammunition stashes, rocket launching stations etc stay in the building and are destroyed.

      To be honest, I’m shocked those protocols are still used after Hamas’s attack. I would absolutely not be surprised of these measures stopped.

      The anti-Israel don’t care that Israel is bending over backwards to minimize human suffering while fighting a decades long war against people who are deliberately trying to kill their children.

      Remember how upset they are when Israel does something 100 percent defensive, like build a security fence to keep out an endless stream of suicide bombers?

      This isn’t good-faith criticism.

      These people hate Israel for this that they works be applauding other countries for. And we all know why

      • Imotali@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Hey so I know we’ve been doing a genocide but look, we’re being really nice when we bomb innocent civilians homes by letting them know we’re going to bomb their homes.”

        This (a) doesn’t excuse literal genocide and (b) is just a “nicer” version of exactly the thing they’re appalled Hamas just did. You don’t get to cry foul if you’re going to retaliate with a tit for tat play.

    • NathanielThomas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      99
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s dozens of countries where Islam is practiced and only one country where Judaism is. The Muslims have a massive amount of options yet they insist on trying to take back Israeli lands. They don’t have to stay there. They stay because the end goal is wiping out Israel and restoring complete control with Islam.

      • homura1650@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is only one country whose national religion is Judaism, but it is practiced in plenty of other places.

        More to the point, the fact that there are other Islamic countries is of little comfort to the Palestinians. They do not live in those countries and those countries do not want them.

        Some of those countries do provide varying levels of support for Hamas because they (accurately) see it as an indirect way to attack Israel.

        By the same token, any blame you want to place on Israel for this conflict reflects on Isreal as whole, and not every individual living within it.

        • Anduin1357@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          The whole reason why other Islamic (Arab) countries don’t accept Palestinians is so that they retain their “rightful” claim to lands annexed by Israel from the 1948 Arab-Israeli war.

          The Palestinians did it to themselves that they couldn’t live peacefully with the Israelis back then and should accept the outcome of the war as a failing of the Arab League and their resistance.

          Besides, you can’t deny that the Arab world owes some debt to the Palestinians to accept their refuge since it was the Arab League that lost all those attempts to retake Palestinian lands (amongst other things), and yet they don’t do it.

          The religious aspect of all this is just secondary to the secular reason.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Dude. The Palestinians only ever reacted in that time frame. It was the Jewish settlers that attacked the British soldiers and then turned on the Palestinians. Go ask a British military historian.

            • V H@lemmy.stad.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You realise just how racist it sounds when you’re blaming the Palestinian people as a whole for the actions of a subset?

                • V H@lemmy.stad.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Do you have evidence that a huge majority wants to take over states if they are invited in, which was the claim you were making?

                  To quote you:

                  The whole reason they don’t take Palestinians in is because Palestinians try to take their country over.

                  It happened in Jordan, it happened in Lebanon. It will happen anywhere they are allowed to congregate.

                  This is full on far-right “if you let those immigrants in they’ll take over” rhetoric.

                  EDIT: I’d also like to point out, that in fact this notion of a people coming in and trying to “take over” ironically given the context here has a long-standing history as an anti-semitic trope when used against Jewish people. It’s no less of a racist trope when employed against other groups, though.

                  • Anduin1357@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Well, this whole thing would have ended much sooner if it weren’t for the Arab League. They used the Palestinian people against the Israelis even as they kept losing.

                    The Palestinians are probably not that bad of a people, but it doesn’t help that they keep making armed struggles for a lost cause when they can just make peace on their loss.

      • V H@lemmy.stad.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Treating all muslims as if they’re all the same and interchangeable is pure racism.

        • Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well by another definition they all have the same core religious view. Just as any other religion that perpetuates collective hysteria and war. Humanity is better without any kind of organized dogma. Let’s jettison the stone age thinking.

          • V H@lemmy.stad.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If all they did was argue for jettisoning stone age thinking, I’d have been all for that. But instead the person I replied to engaged in just another variant of the same stone age thinking.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        So they should give up their homes, land, resources, and culture for the last gasp of colonialism?

        • NathanielThomas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Jews have a tiny parcel of land on earth. The Muslims have dozens of countries to live.

          So yes. I have no sympathy for the Muslims here.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Jews can own land all over the world. So can Muslims. This is a false dichotomy.

            • NathanielThomas@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              1 year ago

              What’s not a false dichotomy is the fact that there are 50 Muslim-majority countries on Earth where they will not be persecuted for their religion.

              There is one Jewish majority country on earth and it is under constant attack by Islamic militants who want them subjugated and destroyed.

              After world war two, they will never let that happen again.

              • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                There’s a hundred countries they can both live in without problems. There is no amount of past trauma that justifies ethnic cleansing for literal settlers to move in.

                • SwampYankee@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  As a Jew, no, there is no country in the world I can live in without problems, including Israel. America has been wonderful to us, but I grew up seeing swastikas spray painted on my synagogue and being taunted by the goyim. A far cry from the persecution my ancestors have endured, but I don’t delude myself into thinking I’m safe here if the economic/political situation deteriorates.

                  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That level of unsafe is true of anywhere for all religions. If that’s the standard than none of this matters anyways.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            As somebody else pointed out, reducing the people in Palestine to Muslims and they treating all people who happen to be muslims as if they’re as the same, is pure unadulterated racism of the worst, most disgusting, kind.

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        How does it feel to be the exact caricature Hamas shows the children of slaughtered families for recruitment?

        • NathanielThomas@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How does it feel to argue about Israel when literal terrorists slaughter concert goers?

          These Hamas guys deserve worse than Guantanamo and I the IDF goes medieval on Palestine.