• Peaty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    I never said we shouldn’t do it. I said that some unhoused don’t want to be housed so the solution isn’t that simple.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      To add another layer of complexity, if all the most visible of the homeless - the crazy, the drug addicts, etc - were to vanish overnight, we would immediately stop caring about the remaining “good homeless” because they don’t impact our daily lives.

      • kase@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I think I’m missing something. How would offerring housing result in the visible homeless disappearing and not the invisible/“good” homeless? The housing is being offered to both, right?

        • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m giving a hypothetical scenario that’s not directly related to the concept of offering housing.

          My point was that we need solutions for both the visible and invisible homeless, though the current drive for solutions is almost entirely because of the visible homeless.

          And I was saying that to illustrate the complexity of the situation.

      • pinkdrunkenelephants
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        So just admit that your real issue is you don’t want to see unkempt people consuming hard drugs on the streets, and address that instead of pretending this is mainly about homeless people.

        Housed people will do that shit, too, you know.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is a non-issue. The solution IS that simple, actually. Give anyone who does want a home a home. If the others don’t want a home well that’s on them. Kinda throwing out the baby with the bathwater saying it’s not so easy because it won’t solve every problem for everyone.

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’ll agree that it requires immense public buy in, that’s part of why I’m as passionate and emphatic about it as I am. For sure it’s going to require some changing minds.

          When I said non-issue, I’m talking from the perspective of societal problems. A person who wants housing and does not have it is an issue regardless of how. A person who does not want housing and does not have housing is a non-issue. They’re living in a way I don’t necessarily think is best, but they’re living how they want.

          As far as bussing goes, that’s just a shit practice by a shit group. Not really relevant to the broader discussion of solving homelessness. That NIMBY attitude is definitely part of the public buy in that needs to be addressed.