• Montagge@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah, but Kamala Harris didn’t throw Netanyahu off of the Hell in a Cell in 1998

  • Widdershins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    Remember when that walking botched dick enhancement who did the seig heil dragged a sink to some function as a “let that sink in” moment? Fucking ruined and poisoned the colloquialism.

    • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh no, we just recycle it into meaning “I’m a massive pos (lying/cheating/… fill that in as you like) who has an attitude while being wrong and detrimental to society/this planet.”

      When there’s some dangerous sexpest asshole at the door you sarcastically say “oh sure, let that sink in”. (And then you don’t of course)

    • nexguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      A pile of wet rotting bloody turd plops with cancer polyps should have beaten Trump in 2024… by a wide margin. Well, as long as it’s a male turd pile I suppose.

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          And why are you talking about hillary on this meme?

          • A drunk from Fox News is heading the Department of Defense
          • An ex-heroine addict who snorted cocaine off of toilet seats is running the Human Health and Human Services
          • A puppy killer who is having an affair on her tax-paid-for private sex-jet is running Department of Homeland Security
          • The above all report to a 34 count convicted felon who’s been accused of raping children multiple times with at least one witness willing to testify.
          • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.worldBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Indeed. Do you not see the connection? Democrats run remarkably unpopular candidates and screw the working class when the country protest votes one of these turkeys into office.

            And when they lose, they blame progressives. Despite progressive policies and progressive candidates being wildly popular.

            Hmm, it’s almost like killing progress is more important to liberal democrats than winning.

            Can’t imagine how that’s related to our current predicament.

            • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Hmm, it’s almost like you’re trying to change the conversation.

              Trump was besties with a pedophile, is a pedophile and a murderer. The republicans won’t do anything about it because they’re also that stuff and/or support it. The end.

      • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        No one tells me more how much they dislike Hilary than liberal women. She was a terrible candidate. She’s unlikeable. Women (including my mom) hate how she stood by her cheating husband so she could grasp at power. How she rode his coattails to the senate, the only elected office she ever held. Then she was appointed to Secretary of State where she started a bunch of civil wars in the Middle East to burnish her “presidential bona fides.” And then simply showed up at the general election in 2016 without a platform expecting to be coronated — because it was her turn.

        You know who else didn’t like her? Pollsters. They saw she would lose.

        You know who else didn’t like her, or at least her chances of winning? Democrats. Actual Democrats, not voters. They knew she would lose and ran her anyway so it would be up or out of the top spot for her, and everyone in the party would get promotions.

        Her own autobiography of her loss documented over and over that any plank in her platform that might help regular people was discarded because it might slightly raise taxes on the rich. Until there was nothing left.

        There’s a reason her slogan was “I’m with her!” — what else was she campaigning for?

    • trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      The entire fucking Muppet Show would be a sane and reasonable choice in comparison.

      But don’t worry, possibly there won’t even be a next election.