Stop. That isn’t evidence. None of those are accusing me of attacking someone while engaging in DARVO-like behavior, which is the claim you made. I haven’t really made a claim for them to say is wrong other than that the person in the meme should be more direct with their friend, a claim you have never engaged with. That I have been misinterpreted about the spirituality of tarot is the bulk of my explanations elsewhere - something you again choose to ignore. You’re again blatantly trying to gaslight me.
When confronted with evidence, the perpetrator then attacks the person that they had harmed, or are still harming.
You’re literally doing DARVO while you do this. You have never attempted to engage with me on this, nor my criticism of your behavior in my previous replies here, you’ve simply chosen to attack, attempt to gaslight and accuse me of being the aggressor.
Look at your comments. I accused you of being a jerk and attacking me, and you immediately:
Finally, the perpetrator claims that they were or are actually the victim in the situation, thus reversing the positions of victim and offender.
You started the accusations of narcissim, including inventing that other people were accusing me of attacking them by engaging in DARVO-like behavior then attempting to gaslight me about it. When you weighed in on this conversation it was to mock me for expressing confusion - that was a discussion not an argument, if a rather rude one - in a conversation where I had sincerely asked for someone else’s perspective and was given a perfunctory lack of explanation. Elsewhere in this thread are very minor arguments, sure - all of them based on a misunderstanding, or (after you joined) one person posting a rude meme.
You have refused to engage with what I’ve said from the beginning, and you’ve devolved to even trying to gaslight me about being the one who said they were done with this conversation - which, I note, you continue not to be done with.
Sigh. That’s not how you use that, but I’ll point out you’re trying to gaslight me yet again with it by implying that I was somehow sealioning in that comment or this thread.
Sealioning is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity (“I’m just trying to have a debate”), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter.
In this case I’ve only asked you for evidence of one claim once, and then referred back to you not providing it. I’m not after more evidence, and I’m not attempting to badger you into giving me evidence, I’m just trying to get you to stop gaslighting me. Although I’ll happily concede that probably wasn’t you trying to gaslight me just now since sealioning is kinda a weird one (and you’re unfamiliar with it). My bad there.
Stop. That isn’t evidence. None of those are accusing me of attacking someone while engaging in DARVO-like behavior, which is the claim you made. I haven’t really made a claim for them to say is wrong other than that the person in the meme should be more direct with their friend, a claim you have never engaged with. That I have been misinterpreted about the spirituality of tarot is the bulk of my explanations elsewhere - something you again choose to ignore. You’re again blatantly trying to gaslight me.
You’re literally doing DARVO while you do this. You have never attempted to engage with me on this, nor my criticism of your behavior in my previous replies here, you’ve simply chosen to attack, attempt to gaslight and accuse me of being the aggressor.
Look at your comments. I accused you of being a jerk and attacking me, and you immediately:
It’s almost beat for beat.
“I’m not doing Darvo, you’re doing Darvo!”
Classic. I’ll just leave it up to the peanut gallery to judge.
And again you ignore that you started this and attempt to turn it around on me.
I started this? The top level comment is yours, and you were already arguing with people who called you out by the time I chimed in…
You started the accusations of narcissim, including inventing that other people were accusing me of attacking them by engaging in DARVO-like behavior then attempting to gaslight me about it. When you weighed in on this conversation it was to mock me for expressing confusion - that was a discussion not an argument, if a rather rude one - in a conversation where I had sincerely asked for someone else’s perspective and was given a perfunctory lack of explanation. Elsewhere in this thread are very minor arguments, sure - all of them based on a misunderstanding, or (after you joined) one person posting a rude meme.
You have refused to engage with what I’ve said from the beginning, and you’ve devolved to even trying to gaslight me about being the one who said they were done with this conversation - which, I note, you continue not to be done with.
Sigh. That’s not how you use that, but I’ll point out you’re trying to gaslight me yet again with it by implying that I was somehow sealioning in that comment or this thread.
Sealioning means to ignore all evidence while repeatedly demanding evidence in a badgering sort of way, does it not?
Not quite:
In this case I’ve only asked you for evidence of one claim once, and then referred back to you not providing it. I’m not after more evidence, and I’m not attempting to badger you into giving me evidence, I’m just trying to get you to stop gaslighting me. Although I’ll happily concede that probably wasn’t you trying to gaslight me just now since sealioning is kinda a weird one (and you’re unfamiliar with it). My bad there.