The final home of Marilyn Monroe – and the only residence she ever owned independently – will remain standing for now after Los Angeles officials intervened to block the property’s demolition.

The news that the new owners of 12305 Fifth Helena Drive, where Monroe died at age 36, filed for demolition permits had attracted widespread outrage. Los Angeles city councilwoman Traci Park said she received hundreds of calls urging her to save the Spanish colonial-style house in the city’s Brentwood neighborhood.

“Unfortunately, the department of building and safety issued a demolition permit before my team and I could fully intervene and get this issue resolved,” Park said at a news conference last week, adding that there was a need for “urgent action”.

  • deegeese
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There was not a single thing in that article which makes that house special. The only claim to fame seems to be “long dead actress owned it for a couple years”.

    It’s all talking about how she was a famous icon. This is gross celebrity worship/fetishism.

    • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s nothing in the article, because you, me, the author and the council don’t yet know whether there is anything of historical value in the building. That’s why they are proposing to take a look before it’s knocked down.

      • deegeese
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bad faith NIMBY action to try and landmark a mediocre house at the last minute.

        If it has architectural merit, why did it take 60 years for anyone to notice?

        • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Who said anything about architectural merit. Yes, she was an iconic actress, married to De Magio and Arthur Miller and she was also extraordinarily well connected. I know nothing about the property’s architectural or historical importance. But having a look before bulldozing isn’t outrageous.

          I doubt the people who are lobbying are neighbours, so NIMBY isn’t really applicable