• Izzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s more like we wouldn’t birth 900 more people because the density of livable space doesn’t allow it.

      • Izzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. They would just be birthed elsewhere. It has yet to be seen if we can hit a global population cap. It seems like it has to be reached eventually.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is a population cap but it’s societal, people have fewer children as they get more education and higher quality of life.

          Which is the solution that conservatives don’t want to acknowledge, if you think overpopulation is a problem then you solve it by making people not live in such abject misery that they need 6 kids to make sure enough of them survive to take care of their parents when they grow old.

      • Izzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We are in a hypothetical plot of tiny land that can be thought of as the entire world. If you have an argument to make based on this rather silly hypothetical world we are talking about then feel free to make it.