• watson387
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really don’t think this is a good idea. Fascist media will be selectively editing the footage to tell lies about what’s really going on, and we all know the people that watch/listen to that garbage are not concerned with actual facts.

    • galaxies_collide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The media already does that, so it’s really no different. Without live streaming, the media would just straight up lie about what happened in court and live streaming provides vital protection against that. Trump WILL lie about what happens in court, this is why they are live streaming it.

      • watson387
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        True. It’s pretty fucked up that this is even something to be worried about. Trump and his cronies are dogshit.

    • Auzy@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      Trump’s lawyers will definitely be telling lies and spindoctoring everything anyway.

      The difference is, by making it public, it will be very easy to rebuke it

      It’s actually a good thing imho

      • terrrmus@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        So far they have all had the luxury of having their cases behind closed doors. There’s so many times where a judge has laid into them for trying to push ridiculous shit. If that happens (which we know it will because they are clowns) it would be great for the public to see the look on their faces.

    • eratic@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Disinformation will be spread regardless. Yes, if there’s footage it does mean it can be edited and spliced. But then it’s even easier to clearly show that it’s disinformation if people can just watch the footage.

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Precisely this. Whether they have public video of the trial or not, Republicans are going to make up a fantasy version of it anyway. Might as well have this major piece of history on public record as it happens.

    • Big P@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s never a good idea to live stream court cases. It interferes with actual justice and makes it a show instead

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dude, it’s a great idea lol.

      Not sure why anyone would be against this. Your concern is a non-issue and just makes sense to people who live in fantasy worlds.

      • watson387
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They do it all the time and their viewers will take their word for it no matter how much evidence you show them against it. Sounds like you’ve been living in a fantasy world if you don’t see how they’re going to play it. They’ll tell lies and their followers will be foaming at the mouth, which creates more violence.

        Edit: spelling

        • bobman@unilem.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right. Everyone does everything all the time. That’s because there are over 7 billion people on the planet all with different goals and agendas.

          What you’re saying though is this will be so widespread and significant, that we should avoid broadcasting the trial altogether. That is why you’re living in a fantasy world. You don’t understand that magnitude matters and think 1 person doing something is enough to change course.

          Gonna have to block you now. I don’t think you can argue in a rational manner. Goodbye.

          • watson387
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wow. Talk about an overreaction. I wasn’t even arguing. Glad I was blocked. Lol

    • watson387
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except OJ didn’t have rabid, braindead supporters waiting to cause violence after a conviction.

      • hansl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Short memory; there were protests and violence when he was acquitted. I can’t blame you for not remembering it after almost 30 years; chances are you probably weren’t born. But OJ had a lot of rabid, brain dead supporters, and he had a lot of rabid, brain dead opponents. And that was for a single guy (allegedly? He was found not guilty) murdering his wife, not a rich dude trying to subvert democracy.

        It was an insane trial through and through.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Donald Trump’s trial in Georgia over charges of election fraud will be livestreamed and televised, a judge has ruled.

    All the hearings will be available live on Fulton County Court’s YouTube channel, said Judge Scott McAfee.

    Mr Trump and 18 people are charged with a conspiracy to overturn the state’s 2020 presidential election results.

    Mr Trump briefly travelled to Atlanta last week to turn himself in at Fulton County Jail and have his mugshot taken.

    Prosecutors allege that he pressured Georgia officials to reverse the results of the election in the state, which he lost to Democrat Joe Biden.

    The former New York real estate tycoon is the current frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination and his mounting legal problems have done nothing to dent his popularity among his supporters.


    The original article contains 449 words, the summary contains 131 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!