• amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Producing wafers for solar panels is indeed one of the most ecologically damaging activities we can engage in. Have you ever been to a semiconductor fab?

    • iterable@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Solar does not mean just solar panels. There are methods of using solar without them. Also what about wind, geothermal, or tidal?

      • amigan@lemmy.dynatron.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        What else does it mean, CSP? I’d love to see more CSP projects, but it’s not where most of the investment is. Wind, as I’ve pointed out, is even less space-efficient than solar. And geothermal also isn’t seeing the same investment dollars. It should. Tidal power is interesting, but good luck with the fishing lobby. My state has the first commerical offshore wind farm in the US, and it continues to receive significant backlash from the fishing industry. This isn’t nearly as invasive as tidal might be.

        And this is to ignore the elephant in the room, that without nuclear, we will not get away from fossil fuels soon enough. We don’t have the technology to solve the base load problem with renewables yet. Making plans based on some assumed cadence of progress is a recipe for disaster. Storage is a hard problem, and batteries are such a dirty, shitty technology.