[Mention your Sex if you are comfortable, I want to see the breakdown between the sexes here]

I just tried to skim through Linux User Manual and it was really quite informative and made me think of reading it someday, but I kinda know for a fact that that someday might never come, but it’s truly a shame though.

Now, you, yes you! Have you read the user manual of your Operating system!

[I am wasting a lot of time on here, so I won’t be engaging or enraging y’all, but this is a good convo topic, isn’t it? (try that on a girl), I just wanted to know how many or how few people read UMs]___

  • original_ish_name@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Operating systems come with usermanuals? I’ve read a fair bit of the archwiki and manpages if that counts

      • Bizarroland@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s on page 1549, fourth paragraph down, “if you’re reading this it’s too late you’re never going to have sex” -Richard Stallman

    • ivanafterall@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll follow-up with the similarly naive: does Windows have a Linux-like thorough user manual? I’ve never even considered it.

  • elvith@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I got a manual (or just a general book about DOS?) with my first MSDOS PC, which I read. Otherwise no. I have read books about Linux or specific parts of Windows/Linux, but no “official” manual.

  • autumn@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, because documentation should be more like a dictionary than a novel - it’s written to convey info quickly and accurately, not interestingly. 😆

    Next time no need to add on apologetic stuff at the end of your post. People will engage with your post or not, it’s the Internet, it’s fine

  • Shambling Shapes@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Looks like they’re coming over from reddit. Obligatory “women, not girls you incel. Go outside and touch grass”.

    Reading an OS manual cover to cover is a collosal waste of time. There are more efficient ways to level up skills. But what do I know with my gIrLy LoGiC.

  • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I usually just read the sections relevant to me.

    As useful as they are, user manuals are usually not known for their prose

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I read most of the DOS 6.0 manual around 1994. This was the era of memory management. Computers had 640k of conventional memory despite my PC having 4M of total ram. Every TSR you could extract out to high or extended memory would have a massive impact on the performance of high demand applications (like all my important applications from Lucas Arts…). I managed to get mouse, soundcard, video, and other drivers loaded and still have 580+K of free conventional memory.

    Now I design web scale server architectures capable of handling hundreds of requests per second with five 9’s of uptime (for a few years anyway), and that memory management, from back when I was a tween, is still one of my proudest technological achievements. Thanks DOS manual!

  • blivet@artemis.camp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I read the entire manual that came with the Macintosh LC that my wife and I bought in 1990.

    • redballooon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh, now that you mention ancient times, I think I read through the entire DR DOS 6 manual.