• mindbleach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    English is a creole gone feral.

    Some poor sheep farmers who thought the Thames was a lovely bit of river spent one thousand years getting rolled by the Picts, the Romans, the Angles, the Normans, the Saxons, the Franks, the Danes… and half of those were just the French wearing different hats. Most of these conquerors, heirs, and particularly rowdy tourists left a significant linguistic impact this mongrel archipelago of mayonnaise-filled peasants.

    I’m in south Florida. Doctors’ offices usually have multilingual signs. Haitian Creole always looks goofy, but you immediately realize - that’s what English would look like if we fixed the fucking spelling. They look at French’s oodles of rules that all matter, and English’s very simple rules we don’t follow, and said “Sa trè estipid, nou ka fè pi byen.”

    • niktemadur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      mongrel archipelago of mayonnaise-filled peasants

      Oh yeah!

      that’s what English would look like if we fixed the fucking spelling

      Holy shit!

    • Pelicanen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      that’s what English would look like if we fixed the fucking spelling. They look at French’s oodles of rules that all matter

      Can’t we just use the Finnish rule of “each letter is only pronounced one way ever” and solve all the headaches?

      • mindbleach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If we ditch latin for IPA, maybe.

        Maybe.

        The more likely outcome is that some words would adopt those revised pronunciations, but most wouldn’t, fracturing the rules by creating arbitrary exceptions. This has of course happened over and over and over. That is the shape of the hole we are in.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s an interesting history behind why colonel is spelled and pronounced how it is…

      https://www.deseret.com/1996/8/4/19258272/french-italian-roots-explain-why-colonel-has-an-r-sound

      To investigate that question, we have to go back a little further into the word’s history. The French word “coronel” is derived from the Italian word “colonnello.” When the French borrowed the word, however, they found it difficult to pronounce. In an effort to ease the pronunciation problem, they changed the first “l” sound to an “r” sound. This is quite a common occurrence; when there are two “l” sounds or two “r” sounds near each other in a word, one of them is frequently omitted or changed to a different sound to eliminate a tricky pronunciation. Linguists call this type of alteration “dissimilation.”

      When English later adopted the word (in the 16th century), the French pronunciation was kept, but the letter “r” was changed back to an “l,” making the term look more like the original Italian word and producing the conflict we continue to have between spelling and pronunciation.

      • Beartotem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The french word is “colonel”, it’s from latin, much like the italian “colonnello” and the spanish “Coronel”.

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Spanish in Mexico gets weird with the X:
    Mexico - Mejico
    Xochimilco - Sochimilco
    Mexica - Mechica
    Necaxa - Necaksa

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    My mind was blown when my favorite 90s band “Live” was actually the live from “Alive” and not live from " Living".

    • lugal
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Stupid question but what’s the difference?

      • jaschen@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Being alive is just not being dead. Living an income sufficient to live on or the means of earning it.

        • lugal
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And alive is a diphtong < i > (/ai/) and living a short i, right? (I’m not a native speaker if not obvious)

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    english is my second language and i feel it has wasted a lot of brain memory, because i have to learn the spelling and pronunciation of each word separately and the link them together, when i could just learn one of those and know the other

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same and in most situations I can pass as an English first speaker.

      I was at IKEA buying a bed frame and asked the person at the counter if she had put the slats on the bill… But I pronounced it like slates because I was sure I had seen an “e” at the end of the word and there went the illusion 🤷

        • The_v@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          How many native speakers actually use proper grammar when speaking? The common spoken and written language have many differences.

          Also 15-20% percent of the population has reading reading disorders. So around 1 in 5 or 6 people struggle with the archaic billshit grammar.

          BTW “Proper Grammar” as a concept only exists from classism and racism mostly from the late 19th century and early 20th. It has been used to suppress undersirables from climbing the social ladder. Before then spelling and grammar was more fluid. Spelling was more random and differences were accepted.

          Or I could just be dumb…

          • Default_Defect@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Having a reading disorder is a pretty good excuse, so it doesn’t conflict with anything I said. If your education suffered due to some sort of systemic oppression, that is also a pretty good excuse. My uncle that thinks the word “our” is “are” even though he graduated from the same high school as my mom and with similar grades, is just an idiot. Thanks for trying.

            • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              But does it matter? If he’s around a lot of beginning language learners, it could hamper understanding, but otherwise it’s just not in keeping with conventions.

          • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes. German has official grammar and orthography (though it’s only legally binding in school and for the government) since 1903.

            Before that everybody wrote how they liked. If you look at original manuscripts of even well known authors, like Schiller for example, you’ll find the same word spelled differently on the same page.

  • Cabrio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    “The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don’t just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary.” - James D. Nicoll

  • Especially_the_lies@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s an I Love Lucy scene where Ricky is trying to prove he is capable of reading to their baby, and the book is filled with -ough words.

    My heart goes out to anyone trying to learn this language as a second (or third or…) language.

  • hansl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes! I’ve made that comment a lot; French is easier to learn than English because you only need to learn how to pronounce syllables, while in English you have to learn every single word. It’s insane.

    • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol. Spoken and written French are so different they’re basically two different languages…

      • magikmw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a two year Duolingo slave I can attest french is in fact 3 languages in a coat.

        There’s written french, official spoken french and then the soup everyone speaks because nobody cares about proper speech rules.

      • Jomn@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        French is still pretty consistent once you know the syllables. If you give me a word I don’t know, I’ll still be able to pronounce it correctly. You can’t expect that with English.

          • Jomn@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ok, it’s true that verbs have different pronunciation rules. If you know that it is the verb, it’s not an issue. But I admit that it can be tricky for new learners.

            • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yeah, everything’s easy once you’ve learned the exceptions!

              So, heteronyms do exist, and there’s several hundreds of them. Yes, less prevalent than English, still though.

              Now let’s turn around: homophones.

              How do you spell [so]?

              L‘auteur a peur des [otœr]? Is the author afraid of heights or authors? 🤔

              Il y a plein d‘[o] [o] [o]. Good luck writing that down.

              And let’s not go down the route of ambiguous verbs, where different verbs end up with the exact same conjugation, shall we. Rayions? Peignant? Moules (also plural of moule, lol)?

              Oh, what about those accents? Say what you want about German Umlauts, but at least they’re consistent. Why does accent grave not change the pronunciation of a and u, but e? How do you know where to put an accent circonflexe?

              • Jomn@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Homophones don’t impact the pronunciation though, which was the main subject of the top comment (the second part anyway). And I definitely agree that French is not easy for foreigners, especially regarding spelling. But pronunciation rules are much more consistent than in English.

                To summarize, my point is that going from the spelling to the pronunciation is (much) easier in French than in English. The other way around (pronunciation -> spelling) is of course much harder in French, as you said, and the French school system shows that: we just have to look at how important the exercise of “La Dictée” is.

                Small note to be finicky: “L‘auteur a peur des [otœr]?” is not an issue, since for “auteurs”, you pronounce the “liaison” with “des”, whereas you don’t with “hauteurs”. But I still get your point ;)

                • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Well, the joke is about the relation between spoken and written English, so „how do you write [o]“ is just the same joke but in reverse 🤷‍♀️

                  And none of that touches my original point, i.e. that written french is syntactically different from spoken French.

                  Look, I have several German-French friends with whom I took French class in high-school. They grew up with two languages, their spoken French is flawless, they couldn’t write a single paragraph if their lives depended on it.

        • Tathas@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Loic Suberville’s YouTube shorts on French vs English (and sometimes Spanish) are pretty entertaining to show that they’re all difficult as a non-primary language. :)

    • isthingoneventhis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Man French was so difficult for my brain to parse. The word genders felt so silly/arbitrary that it never stuck, which is hilarious given the context of … English, but omfg did it not gel with me.

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah the general lack of gendered nouns is one of English’s better traits, even if most of our words are bastardized words from other languages.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I actually ran into someone on Reddit who thought we should embrace it. They might be here too, I don’t know.

    How would one go about making a “font” that looks like the bonus panel? It’s harder to learn all the logographs but you can fit a lot of information on a page that way.

    • Aatube@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      just learn chinese

      To answer your question: You’d have to have ligatures for every single word in existence so that is not possible.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder what character set would work best for writing the English language. I’m legitimately thinking Korean could handle it better than the latin alphabet