Pelicanen

I was hoping it was gonna be that video! One of the few times I will agree that size matters.

According to Einstein, you can sit on a hot stove.

Anything that makes it even a little bit harder for Russia to torture and rape another country’s population is money well spent.

Anyone who ever says “I don’t make mistakes” should immediately be distrusted.

Wouldn’t it be “Nåo trit”?

That’s probably the next step of this for the alt-right: When nazi symbolism has been normalized, it’ll be “Most nazis weren’t bad, only the well-known ones”.

The dude who owns AWS stood behind Trump at the inauguration. The owner of the third biggest cloud service was in the same row.

Republicans.

That is A: debatable and B: something that happened thanks to the lend-lease program. A lot of brave soviets put their lives on the line, but so did soldiers of many other countries.

He did. He helped build it.

22.95% of voters at 68.42% turnout, so 15.7% of eligible voters, voted for his party.

Luigi Mangione has not been found guilty of any crime. As of the time when writing this, he is an innocent man suspected of committing a crime. Until proven otherwise, he is not the person who shot the CEO.

I would like to note that Luigi has not been found guilty of anything and that both him deserving the presumption of innocence as well as the shooting being justified can be true at the same time.

The police are trying to convince the public that he did it so they can make a show out of punishing him to deter future acts against the rich, we shouldn’t do part of their job for them.

I think it’s originally from Red vs Blue

Luigi got attention for being arrested, the police are the ones alleging that he was the one who shot the CEO.

Too many people forget this part. Luigi Mangione is, until proven otherwise, innocent. The police, the same people who have spent decades killing them people (especially minorities) and planting evidence, largely with impunity, are alleging that he is the one who did it. Luigi is likely a victim of the health insurance industry but, until it is proven otherwise, he and the shooter are two separate individuals.

People with a lot of wealth and power want to put a bow on this to prevent more frustration from being directed at them.

It can be discussed without the assumption that he is guilty. I think it is dangerous for the public to remove the presumption of innocence, especially in cases like this where the ones affected are the ones with power.

I would even argue that it’s more important to argue with the presumption of innocence. Someone killed a health insurance company CEO and a lot of people are rejoicing over it, then someone who is quite possibly innocent and who seems to have suffered from health insurance company decisions has been arrested for it. How many other people have experienced something similar to Luigi? How many other people fit the profile because the system destroys that many lives? He has already suffered, how much more will he have to suffer for something that he possibly had no connection to, for the benefit of the people who seem to have already ruined his life?

Who? The shooter or Luigi? Until proven otherwise, they are two separate people.

To be fair, we don’t yet know with certainty who took him out.

I think… I think he meant the suit suit, not the skin suit.

I think.