First you release something, wait until is widely adopted and then add ways to control users or capture their data, for example host contents on a CDN you control, or add paid extras, or switch license for later releases. All of this examples happened in the past.
The good old embrace-extend-lock-in.
Yeah, but that doesn’t affect the code that’s already released. If MS releases something in the future under a different license that’s really a separate discussion.
First you release something, wait until is widely adopted and then add ways to control users or capture their data, for example host contents on a CDN you control, or add paid extras, or switch license for later releases. All of this examples happened in the past. The good old embrace-extend-lock-in.
We’re talking about an emoji set released under MIT here.
I clearly wrote “switch license for later releases”
Yeah, but that doesn’t affect the code that’s already released. If MS releases something in the future under a different license that’s really a separate discussion.
deleted by creator
Well in the end the purpose is the same. A company does not do that kinda of stuff because they love users unconditionally or something like that.
https://www.gwern.net/Complement