What a cunt

  • futatorius@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is a terrible situation, since two unpleasant things are true at once: the benefits system is riddled with fraudulent claims and mismanagement, but there are also people with genuine disabilities who absolutely rely on these benefits.

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      the benefits system is riddled with fraudulent claims

      If this was true. These actions in no way address such claims. They are purely about making it harder for genuine claims to actually pass the process, and paying less to those that remain. Absolutely nothing in this plan addresses false/fraudulent claims.

      Also, while some fraudulent claims exist, riddled is totally false. The Tories have spent their whole time in office trying to prove your statement. Yet the cost of implementing their extra checks has been hugely more expensive than any claims cancelled.

      You like much of the nation have fallen for the media and channel 4 propaganda.

      • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It’s not. It’s a dog whistle by anyone opposed to social programs.

        The reality is that, although there is abuse in all systems, the level of that abuse is negligible to the point of being a rounding error.

        The goal is to punish everyone for the sake of that small percentage that abuses the system.

        This is not unique to the UK it’s the same song and dance everywhere.

    • Fluke@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      24 hours ago

      The benefits system, relying as it does on privatisation from top to bottom, haemorrhages cash, this is truth.

      Go find out how much actual cash goes in.

      Then find out how much of that actually ends up in claimants’ hands.

      Then, finally, realise the scale of the problem.

      • Fluke@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Did you know that if you’re renting, you can get that rent paid by benefit?

        That rent goes to a landlord who uses that rent to pay the mortgage on the property, maintain it (lol), and some profit.

        If, however, you “own” your home and are responsible for paying the mortgage and maintenance, the best you can get is a loan to cover the interest only. You must pay this loan back with interest if/when you sell your home.

        They’ll happily pay over the odds for “rent” costs to landlords, but they won’t pay less than that to you for your mortgage.

        They’re happy to pay a mortgage, just not to you, the benefit claimant.

        The whole system is rigged to take from the poorest and filter it all to those who have more than enough.

        • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          This has nothing to do with this topic. I don’t disagree with your points. But removing the benefits designed to allow disabled to actually function in anything close to an equal manner. It is in no way going to help your issue.

          And refusing to cover rental housing costs for the poorest members of our population. Without hugely increasing homelessness and death. Will require a huge investment in social housing and time. Long before the nation is ready to stop covering that cost.

          But I agree that sort of move is needed. But that would require an electorate and political party willing to support it.