• Twig
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Asylum seekers aren’t people from mental asylums either, but there you go.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Biden, being a very public figure, wouldn’t really have too much of a tort here. He would have to prove there was actual malice, which is hard.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It would be hard to prove that trump has malice towards Biden?

        You’re kidding, right?

      • TooManyFoods@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’d say actual malice may be provable here (with my layman understanding), but would Biden need to be the one to sue even? Could the scientists who worked on this sue? They wouldn’t likely need to prove actual malice.

        • FauxPseudo @lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          To prove malice it would be required to disprove incompetence. And no jury would be able to find that Trump isn’t incompetent. He may legitimately not know the difference between transgenic and transgender. Even after it’s explained to him he wouldn’t be able to tell the difference.

  • exploitedamerican@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hasnt this repulsive spray tanned diarrhea leaking anal wart spent more than this on golfing in the first 46 days of his second term?