• DFX4509B@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    60 minutes ago

    It’s going to get to the point where you might be better off going back to dot matrix if tank-based inkjet printers are somehow locked down via chemical DRM too.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’m actually looking for a good multifunctional printer. Our Samsung is dying. It was an LED printer and we only changed toner 1 time in 15 years.

  • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    This is a total shit move but I have tried many printers and I’m still choosing Brother everytime. Especially on some older generations with copy scan and print. None of the other big brands are worth a shit. They all fail or jam in some form or fashion.

    • junkthief@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Right? I used to recommend friends and family invest in a brother laser printer instead of inkjet, especially if they didn’t need color

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    ·
    5 hours ago

    In case anyone was thinking this applies only to inkjet printers: no, it ONLY seems to apply to laser printers – the thing that Brother used to be known for. Where the article says “ink”, they mean “toner”. There is no ink in a laser printer.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I believe that only applies to ink jet. You can hardly make secret dots in B&W.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 hours ago

          There is something similar for B&W laser printing. Text is never 100% black, but rastered. You can digitally hide a whole lot of information in microraster on a page of printed text.

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Text is never 100% black, but rastered.

            Does “rastered” mean the image is mapped onto a very fine grid and each square is given a 0-100 value for intensity of ink? I looked it up, and it seemed like the squares are given a binary value, but this is nowhere near my wheelhouse and I’m honestly not sure I understood the Wikipedia page, let alone the references

            • Treczoks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 minutes ago

              It is actually quite easy: “Black” print does not mean that 100% of all pixels are actually set. Print pixels are never perfect squares, so even if the printer only prints half of the dots, the print is still dark enough. If not, it could print 70% or 80%, but lets stick to 50% for ease of argument.

              So instead of

              XXXXXXXX
              XXXXXXXX
              XXXXXXXX
              

              it would print

              X X X X
               X X X X
              X X X X
              

              For you, it would still be a “roughly black” spot (keep in mind these 8x3 pixel are 0.032mm wide and 0.012mm high on good laser printer).

              Would you notice if the pattern was slightly different, like

              X X X X
               X XX  X
              X X X X
              

              Make a bonanza of those small changes nobody can see, and you can hide thosands of bytes of data in those patterns on any printed page.

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s like every company that wasn’t complete playing the social good will game and didn’t appear at a casual glance to be shit just suddenly decided to…go to complete shit. masks off, because they saw it might finally be acceptable to be ghouls again.

      Unfortunately, I’m pretty sure I FTFY. Wish it weren’t so, but that’s definitely what it looks like…

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        47 minutes ago

        The mask of humanity fall[s] from capital. It has to take it off to kill everyone – everything you love; all the hope and tenderness in the world. It has to take it off, just for one second. To do the deed.

        • The Deserter, Disco Elysium

        They are just taking the mask off since they don’t have to wear it right now.

        • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          43 minutes ago

          Game is such a fucking gem. I gotta do a replay soon.

          They are just taking the mask off since they don’t have to wear it right now.

          Cuts into profit margins pretending to not be a threat to the continued existence of the species and ecosystem as a whole. Gotta buy that 15th mega-yacht.

          Something something, I’ll bring the BBQ sauce.

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If regulators don’t stop them from doing it, the CEO’s of publicly traded companies will get the boot from the board for not doing it. They have a fiduciary duty to be as shitty as humanly possible.

      We need laws to stop this, but the politicians are all bribed not to.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Unrestrained Capitalism. Without those pesky regulations, companies can charge us all unlimited amounts and not have to consider our rights or health/safety.

  • Naich@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    167
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Oh FFS. Not Brother as well. I used to recommend them to everyone. Who is left with unshittified printers?

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          50 minutes ago

          I have the 2850. Been using it for a couple years now. Print maybe once a month. Nozzles get clogged periodically but you run the automated cleaning process and it’s back to working again.

        • snek_boi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          This. My partner’s office is stuck with “it has to be inkjet” and not toner, and on January their printer got clogged…

          • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Inkjet is great, for photo printing regularly. For absolutely every other situation a laser printer is better.

        • nul9o9@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Yeah, that’s true. That was a pain in the ass when my wife needed good color accuracy.

        • ben@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 hours ago

          You can run a power clean cycle which should help, then just replace the foam pads they saturate with ink for the cleaning

          They’re not perfect but they’re still the most consumer friendly option on the market at this point

          • IndescribablySad@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            After talking to support 15 times, they never suggested replacing anything, and power clean wasn’t enough. I’ve long since destroyed the thing out of malignant rage and turned to libraries and copy shops, but it’s good to know that there might have been a solution.

        • The Pantser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I don’t print that often but I do have a calendar event to tell me to print something monthly. This could be a nice side project for someone to write a program that sends a print to your printer on a schedule to keep the heads clear. Wastes paper but at least the heads won’t dry out.

    • Tippon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’ve got a Lexmark laser printer, and while there are cheaper subscription toners, you can pay the higher price for normal toner, and buy compatibles, for now at least.

    • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I don’t know if it matters, but I just bought a Canon laser printer. Didn’t see anywhere about forced subscription options for toner.

  • flavonol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If it’s not already under the umbrella of right to repair, do we now need right to refill?

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I suggest whoever has old firmware files to upload them to the Internet Archive (if they allow those).

    • ghostrider2112@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Yep. Just getting ready to replace the color laser printer I bought almost 10 years ago. I had been considering a new Brother before this but looks like I’m going the 2nd hand route again (last one was an open box HP from microcenter for $200 lol)

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I got a tiny HP laser from an old job. Must be 15+ years old, runs perfectly and toner is $20 for god knows how many pages.

      • Quazatron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Looks like nobody can or is willing to do decent printers anymore. I’ll run my Laserjet 1100 till it dies, then I’m done with printing.