“This road is long, and much of the map remains blank. The biggest problem is drilling miles through hot rock, safely. If scientists can do that, however, next-generation geothermal power could supply clean energy for eons.”

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    The image is a test brick being spun around under the output of a MASER which is a type of directed energy weapo…tool. This is normally highly controlled to run tokamaks but they are trying to make it less expensive and adapt it to shot dirt and rocks to evaporate them and easily penetrate at 1meter per hour for around 100 days…~3km deep.

  • CameronDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    Article is paywalled, but geothermal power solutions already exist. NZ gets 25% of its power from geothermal. Its not a science problem, its an engineering one, and mostly solved as well. And fortunately, the oil companies have all the expertise to do it.

    • borokov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      SLB had acquired Celsius Energy, a company that deploy low depth geothermal solution. They are also partner with Genvia to developpe hydrogen. And have also plans for offshore wind turbines. Oil company all have plan to transition to new energy. Then know oil is not a long terme business. The problem is doing the transition while making money. If you dont make money, you die. And if you die, you cannot do transition. Unfortunately, oil still generate shitload of money…

      • CameronDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I’d really like to see governments enact bans on drilling new oil wells. Then suddenly all the tooling for drilling wells is freed up for geothermal wells.

        While oil drilling is profitable, there is always the risk that these new companies get bought out by oil companies and told to drill for oil instead.

        • Nyssa@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It is a good sign that in some countries where leasing is still open, oil companies are buying a lot fewer permits

        • borokov@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          France has ban drilling new Wells on its territory. For now, despite oil lobbying, ban is still applied :) The problem with geothermy is more a social and legal problem. No one care about drilling in the middle of north sea. But geothermic should be drill close to population. And suddenly, everyone becomes afraid of earthquake, and you need dozens of authorizations.

          • CameronDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            France is also 80-90% nuclear from memory, so less demand for other renewables?

            But valid point, its never that simple :(

            • borokov@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              32 minutes ago

              More something like 50% nuclear, 40% renewable, but we also sell lot of nuclear electricity to Germany. Hydraulic is very well used. We have hydrolic power plant everywhere it’s possible. Not many people know this. “Hell ya, why don’t we build more hydrolic plant ?!” Well, because we already did 😅

    • sin_free_for_00_days
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Archive Link I thought all posts were supposed to have alternative links. Whatever.

      The headline is sensationalistic, because we are a country of morons, but the article gives a pretty good overview of the history and engineering problems with geothermal in the US.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not mostly solved because a huge portion of the world doesn’t live above shallow geothermal

      • Longpork3@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        “We have the ability to do this right now, but we need to solve distribution” is exactly what an engineering problem is.

      • CameronDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I can get geothermal right where I live, and its definitely not a shallow geothermal area. Its expensive, because digging the pipes is hard, but its definitely solved.

        You dont have to go that deep to get to warmer than surface air, which is all thats needed to run a heatpump. I dont know what that group is aiming at, but its definitely not a moonshot.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Geothermal heating won’t stop climate change, this is about using geothermal for power which requires going deeper than traditional drilling can do. It’s about taking advantage of the fusion reactor under our feet.

          • CameronDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            If you have a heat differential, you can generate power. Heat pump to boil water and drive a turbine.

            What is this nonsense about a “fusion” reactor under our feet?!? There is no fusion going on in our core.

            Edit: striked out inflammatory phrasing.

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Don’t know what to tell you except that it’s obvious you didn’t read the article nor have you looked into what it’s talking about. They need to go deep enough to get supercritical steam.

              And yes I meant fission, not fusion. But go off on the rest I guess

              • CameronDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                There is no fission inside the earth either, except some exceptionally rare locations. Have you actually looked into what your talking about? I did read the article, but the first half was fluff about them digging a hole and not having enough concrete. The rest is press releases for drilling startups.

                Super critical steam may be what they are trying to get, but it is definitely not a requirement for generating energy.

                Edit: needlessly inflammatory comment striked out.

                • kalkulat@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 hours ago

                  There is A LOT of radioactive matter below the earth’s surface … constantly generating heat.

                  “About 50% of the Earth’s internal heat originates from radioactive decay. Four radioactive isotopes are responsible for the majority of radiogenic heat because of their enrichment relative to other radioactive isotopes: uranium-238 (238U), uranium-235 (235U), thorium-232 (232Th), and potassium-40 (40K).” - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth’s_internal_heat_budget

                • glimse@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Lol I don’t believe you read the article. Don’t lie now when anyone can scroll up and see that you wrote:

                  You dont have to go that deep to get to warmer than surface air, which is all thats needed to run a heatpump. I dont know what that group is aiming at, but its definitely not a moonshot.

                  They aren’t talking about drilling for heatpumps. Not knowing what they’re aiming for is a result of not having read the article.

                  Current drilling technology can’t get us deep enough for the energy we need to use geothermal as a power source. The company in the article is trying a very new method using gyrotrons to vaporize the rock after traditional drilling caps hits a financial barrier.

                  Real Engineering just put out a video on it if you’d rather watch than read.