Ken27238@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoPoor guyi.imgur.comimagemessage-square79fedilinkarrow-up11.72Karrow-down125cross-posted to: linuxmemes@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.7Karrow-down1imagePoor guyi.imgur.comKen27238@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square79fedilinkcross-posted to: linuxmemes@lemmy.world
minus-squareExcel@lemmy.megumin.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up32arrow-down2·1 year agoSo you’re saying it’s about as robust as a typical Linux application then?
minus-squareRaivoKullilinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoPackagers job to make it fit their distro, innit?
minus-squareGentooPhysicist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoAs a package maintainer, it’s a lot of fun sometimes!
minus-squareRaivoKullilinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-21 year agoI bet, both ironically and genuinely, depending on the cade. Flatpak must feel like a godsend to a lot of people haha
minus-squareGentooPhysicist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoI’ve actually never used flatpak, I still prefer distro-specific package managers
minus-squareRaivoKullilinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoFlatpak is really nice imo. You can have stable distro with up-to-date apps. And sandboxing for proprietary stuff, which is really nice.
So you’re saying it’s about as robust as a typical Linux application then?
“It works on my machine”
He said the thing!
Packagers job to make it fit their distro, innit?
As a package maintainer, it’s a lot of fun sometimes!
I bet, both ironically and genuinely, depending on the cade. Flatpak must feel like a godsend to a lot of people haha
I’ve actually never used flatpak, I still prefer distro-specific package managers
Flatpak is really nice imo. You can have stable distro with up-to-date apps. And sandboxing for proprietary stuff, which is really nice.
Username checks out