Nah, I don’t particularly care about property damage to wealthy people. They have plenty and it gets money back into the community they’re stealing their wealth from. Especially when on a societal level, they care about property more than people.
The “virgin” feels targeted so “the guy is an arrogant prick” is a good candidate for your why.
However even it was just opportunistic tagging of someone’s conspicuous show of wealth, I’m definitely not against people becoming aware of how their community sees them as compared to how their Instagram following sees them.
I know Lemmy hates rich people but am I the only one who thinks this is too much?
For me it depends very much on the person owning the car.
From the phrasing of the words I’m convinced it’s an insufferable prick, that besides owning the car has done much more to get this treatment.
But on this matter I remain convincible of the contrary.
Nah, I don’t particularly care about property damage to wealthy people. They have plenty and it gets money back into the community they’re stealing their wealth from. Especially when on a societal level, they care about property more than people.
Exactly, the vandalism is just job creation, the wealthy are always touting that as one of their virtues, so I see no problem here.
Nah, it’s fine. As another commenter pointed out, owner said so himself:
I mean the guy is an arrogant prick, but still, just… why?
The “virgin” feels targeted so “the guy is an arrogant prick” is a good candidate for your why.
However even it was just opportunistic tagging of someone’s conspicuous show of wealth, I’m definitely not against people becoming aware of how their community sees them as compared to how their Instagram following sees them.