They have a right to defend themselves when they are being attacked. They fucked around and are in the process of finding out. They don’t have any right to defense when attacking first.
It’s really simple. Russia attacked Ukraine so when Ukraine occupied Kursk, Russia has zero right to complain.
If a bully keeps bullying someone, until the victim finally snaps back, is it the bully defending themselves or should they not be held at fault for the bullying in the first place?
That wasn’t the question.
They have a right to defend themselves when they are being attacked. They fucked around and are in the process of finding out. They don’t have any right to defense when attacking first.
It’s really simple. Russia attacked Ukraine so when Ukraine occupied Kursk, Russia has zero right to complain.
If a bully keeps bullying someone, until the victim finally snaps back, is it the bully defending themselves or should they not be held at fault for the bullying in the first place?
They were offered a two state solution and rejected it. Whose fault is that?