

I don’t know enough about how the rest of the world runs to generalise further
I don’t know enough about how the rest of the world runs to generalise further
People in power in the west are barely moving the needle for their own people sadly.
Also even if they did, they’d still need a valid cause to start an international conflict I think, it’s why Russia tried the “it’s actually russians in Ukraine that are being oppressed and we’re liberating them” excuse
Generally countries in the west only get involved in conflicts if they get something out of it, be it directly via getting wealth from the country, or indirectly like curbing successful non-capitalistic economies before they catch on and their own people start questioning the billionaires. The “we’re there to liberate people” is just marketing speech.
Unless the videos have proper depth maps and identifiers for objects and actions they’re not going to be as effective as, say, robot arm surgery data, or vr captured movement and tracking. You’re basically adding a layer to the learning to first process the video correctly into something usable and then learn from that. Not very efficient and highly dependant on cameras and angles.
Full (?) Self Driving I’m guessing
Sure but it does help with acceptance from the non-gay religious people
Well, say, country-size :D
Does that lead to any performance hiccups with very detailed svgs? The benefit of raster is you can mipmap them, so you don’t need to see how super detailed the coast of a country is like when it’s only a few pixels on screen. I suppose you could fake mipmaps by having different levels of detail for svgs that get swapped between, as long as any other changes you make to the svg are simple colour changes?
I wish we’d stop using GDP to measure “the economy”
Why not both?
The first change doesn’t seem to be related, but that second link is promising.
I know that makes sense to do, but that’s different from them making plans to do it
What makes you think Labour are looking to change that?
They’re a public platform, they have to moderate and “control” what gets posted, otherwise they get into trouble for it publicly.
I’d say no, you can develop an allergic reaction to many things, doesn’t mean we should ban it all because of that or because it’s upsetting to some people. As for “upsetting” I think it’s everyone’s freedom to perfume however they want, if it’s something socially concerning like idk, smell of puke, then feel free to raise an eyebrow at their choice and vacate the premises (if possible, if it’s on a plane then yeah might need to get them to cover it up), but just because it’s generally unacceptable to use that as an aroma doesn’t mean it should be banned still, unless it directly causes death. Banning something should be a last resort.
What are you even talking about, this is law compliance.
Ai models should contain a database of all the data it was trained on, where it came from, and through what license did it get perms to train on it. That way you don’t get the issue of comparing outputs to real life work, because the issue isn’t with the output, it’s with the use of the data in the first place without permission to train the AI model, and no it’s not similar to humans learning. The scale and accuracy of reproduction from a software is so much higher than a human that it’s not even a comparison, before we get to what it means to allow humans to grow as people by enriching themselves Vs what it means for a corporate owned churner.
Sick! Nice job on getting the focus
Hmm I’m not sure using gacha games which are designed for addictive gameplay loops and predatory monetisation being the games that your kid prefers over standalone experiences is a good argument to make
Oh god how is that meant to boost PS2 sales 😂😂😂