Rotes_Tuch@feddit.org to ich_iel@feddit.org · 13 hours agoich_ielfeddit.orgimagemessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1224arrow-down14
arrow-up1220arrow-down1imageich_ielfeddit.orgRotes_Tuch@feddit.org to ich_iel@feddit.org · 13 hours agomessage-square54fedilink
minus-squareIapar@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 hours agoThey want to stop arms delivering in itself. But if that means Ukraine will fall they won’t stop it now.
minus-squareNoiseColor @lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 hours agoThey won’t stop it? What does that mean? Would they increase it if USA stops for instance?
minus-squareIapar@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 hours agoAre you asking me what “not stopping” means? I don’t know about an increase.
minus-squareNoiseColor @lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 hours agoI’m asking are they on board with supplying weapons. Do they understand that there is no other way. Or are they so reluctant that they will change their mind when an opportunity for that occurs?
They want to stop arms delivering in itself. But if that means Ukraine will fall they won’t stop it now.
They won’t stop it? What does that mean? Would they increase it if USA stops for instance?
Are you asking me what “not stopping” means?
I don’t know about an increase.
I’m asking are they on board with supplying weapons. Do they understand that there is no other way. Or are they so reluctant that they will change their mind when an opportunity for that occurs?