You know, DOGE, fascist president and corporations dictating what people can do, institutions being ruined, laws being ignored. Is there any way out of that or is it over? Is the USA done?

  • شاهد على إبادة@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    What’s wrong with building infrastructure? Nothing stopping the West from offering an alternative development plan. Countries go with China’s because it is a better deal with fewer strings attached.

    Instead when the US invaded Iraq it destroyed its infrastructure and opposed any plan to rebuild Iraq. China now is helping rebuild Iraq. Just one example of plenty.

    Then again given the crumbling state of US infrastructure, it should really focus on itself. It brought a lot destruction (see: Gaza) and very little building to the rest of the world even when they broke it (see: Iraq).

    • Tuukka R
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Nothing’s wrong with building infrastructure. Why would it be?

      What’s wrong is the financing scheme that makes the infrastructure effectively Chinese national property. And when China can decide how and when a country’s infrastructure can be used, China gets a lot of influence in that country’s domestic politics. And it does use that influence.

      USA destroying Iraq doesn’t make China any less colonial. China helping rebuild Iraq in a way that will make Iraq a vassal of China… That does make China more colonial.

      USA should absolutely focus on itself. And it will do it much more than before, because now that it has decided to cut its international soft power, it does not really have other options, does it? :)

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        What’s wrong is the financing scheme that makes the infrastructure effectively Chinese national property. And when China can decide how and when a country’s infrastructure can be used, China gets a lot of influence in that country’s domestic politics. And it does use that influence.

        Source: The American Burger-freedom foundation for advanced jingoism research. That $1,600,000,000 the US government earmarked for anti-China propaganda definition getting returns.

        USA destroying Iraq doesn’t make China any less colonial.

        No, but it demonstrates there’s a vast, vast difference between actual colonial violence, and the bullshit that American chauvinists try to describe as colonialism.

        China helping rebuild Iraq in a way that will make Iraq a vassal of China… That does make China more colonial.

        “Yes, America destroying an entire country and killing hundreds of thousands of people is bad, but have you considered that China helping to rebuild that country is actually just as bad?”

        Ghoul. You are a ghoul.

        And it will do it much more than before

        And thank God for that: the world doesn’t need amoral monsters who think that building infrastructure is the same thing as mass bombing and murder fucking with the rest of the world.

        • Tuukka R
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I’m sorry but you sound like the people who call DOGE “auditors” who “look for corruption and end it”.

          China has been trying to get into big infrastructure projects in Finland as well, with the precisely same kind of loan arrangements. And it’s very good that we declined the offer. We were a colony of Sweden for 600 years. We don’t need to become one of China’s now.

          • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m sorry but you sound pike the people who call DOGE “auditors” who “look for corruption and end it”

            What the fuck kind of argument is that? “Oh you sound like the people who say [completely unrelated thing with no resemblence].” OK then, well you sound like the people who say that black people should be sterilized.

            China has been trying to get into big infrastructure projects in Finland as wel

            Infrastructure projects? Oh GOD NO! THE HUMANITY! THEY MIGHT AS WELL BE CARPET BOMBING HELSINKI!

            And it’s very good that we declined the offer. We were a colony of Sweden for 600 years. We don’t need to become one of China’s now.

            Yeah, building infrastructure is exactly like invading a country, massacring the natives, and forcibly taking control, definitely.

            You’re fucking disgusting, colonialism apologist.

            • Tuukka R
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              You, my friend, are defending colonialism and I am opposing your view that colonialism is okay as long as it’s done by a country on a list of “countries allowed to behave in a colonialist manner” that you are curating. And somehow that makes me a colonialism apologist?

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Oh, you’re literally reduced to “no u!” now?

                Well I wouldn’t expect a colonialism apologist to be honest. Oh wait, is me calling you dishonest also colonialism? Is it colonialism when I stub my toe too?

                You’re a ghoul.

                • Tuukka R
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  You calling me dishonest is not colonialism. You stubbing your toe is not colonialism.

                  • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    You, my friend, are defending colonialism and I am opposing your view that colonialism is okay

    • VerifiedSource@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      China is building military infrastructure on contested islands in the south china sea with the goal of controlling the whole area firmly including the first island chain and Taiwan.

      Countries go with China’s because it is a better deal with fewer strings attached.

      There’s also no historical baggage with Chinese colonialism in Africa. Fewer strings also means China doesn’t care about democracy, human rights, and such.

      • شاهد على إبادة@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Fewer strings also means China doesn’t care about democracy, human rights, and such.

        Neither do Western powers. Their support for the genocide in Gaza proves as much. From sending weapons and ignoring the ICC and ICJ rulings, to crushing protests and arresting journalists. You really can’t come and talk about democracy, human rights, and such as if the West is the good guys after we all witnessed the genocide in Gaza, you can’t. It is hypocritical and racist. You are basically saying “only we are people”, or at a minimum “the Palestinians aren’t people”.

        As for China building some artificial islands, who cares? As far as “crimes” go it is really down at the bottom of the crimelist. You could probably learn about the expulsion of the Chagossians to put things into perspective.

          • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            It really is illustrative of the absolute depths of westerners complete thoughtless hypocrisy that they think building a few shacks on uninhabited islands is remotely comparable to what the USA does.

            • VerifiedSource@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Countries in East and Southeast Asia are Westerners now? The Koreans, Taiwanese, Japanese, Pinoy, Vietnamese, Malays will be surprised to hear that. All of these countries are afraid of Chinese ambitions.

              Maybe ask the Tibetans if they think the Chinese annexation of their homeland is just Western hypocrisy.

              remotely comparable to what the USA does

              You are aware that China invaded Vietnam after the USA left?

              You are ignorant of the regional policies. Not everything is as Western centric as your limited understanding of geopolitics.

              • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                he Koreans, Taiwanese, Japanese, Pinoy, Vietnamese, Malays will be surprised to hear that.

                Oh my mistake, I didn’t realize I was talking to the collective lemmy account of the people of Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Pinoy, Vietnam, and Malay.

                Oh wait, I’m not. I’m talking to an arrogant westerner who feels entitled to tell non-westerners what their opinions are, and to tell them that actually they would be no worse off if America was bombing them and taking over.

                You are aware that China invaded Vietnam after the USA left?

                Notice how you have to go back half a century, to an example that is not nearly as bad as what America did.

                You are ignorant of the regional policies.

                No, you’re just a denialist about how brutal western colonialism actually is. You’re not ignorant of it though, you’re an apologist for it, desperately trying to redefine the word so that extermination, violence, conquest, and exploitation in the tens of millions seems no worse than China building some shacks on an island

                • VerifiedSource@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  that actually they would be no worse off if America was bombing them and taking over.

                  What are you even talking about? I never said anything like that.

                  how you have to go back half a century

                  It’s an example that’s relevant to the region and China.

                  • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    What are you even talking about? I never said anything like that.

                    Yes, you did. You’re whole point has been that actually bombing and invading people is no different than not doing that; it’s all “colonialism.”

                    It’s an example that’s relevant to the region and China.

                    Yeah, and you had to go back half a century to find one, and it still wasn’t close to what the US did to Vietnam. It also wasn’t colonialism, for that matter.

                • Tuukka R
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  You probably meant this is an answer to me, so I’ll reply.

                  What I mean is that for example France supporting undemocratic regimes in Africa in order to get cheaper minerals and cheaper cocoa and cheaper bananas is colonialism. It does not mean that it is as bad as what France used to do in the past. And it’s not even as bad as France still retaining several actual colonies. But it is still bad. And it is colonialism. It would be colonialism even if France did not have any formal colonies around the world.

                  And when China does in 2025 what France is now, in 2025, doing with now-independent countries that used to be its formal colonies, then both of those are colonialism in the same manner. If what China is doing is okay, then that part of what France is doing is also okay. And I do not like the idea of accepting European countries’ colonialism, not even a little bit.

                  Being bombed is worse than being economically abused, absolutely. But it does not mean that abusing a country economically is okay. I do not like it at all that cocoa and bananas are as cheap here in Europe as they are. That luxury of low prices is coming from other people’s lack of well-being. And someone doing something even worse does not make this bad thing any better. At least in my opinion.

                  For what I understand, in reality we two think much more alike than you think we do.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Fewer strings also means China doesn’t care about democracy, human rights, and such.

        Looooool. As if the west does.

        American’s continue to be the most propagandized people on Earth.