• RandomVideos@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    They said that it would be more suffering in the short term for them, but it would protect their future and their country

    This wasnt about selfishness, this was about being disinformed

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      No there’s still selfishness. They don’t consider how much short term suffering affects other people. If that person owns their home, has savings, can brace for not having a job for a while that’s great. But it’s pretty blase to say that they’ll be fine while they disregard everyone else who isn’t set up as well

      • RandomVideos@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You can ignore a lot of things if you think its for the greater good

        Also, being selfish and not thinking through all consequences is not the same thing

        • III@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yes but the selfishness lies in how he claims he will be fine, without regard for others. Selfish. He isn’t either selfish or ignorant, he is both.

          • RandomVideos@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            They are saying that they would be fine in the context of being a part of the people that would suffer. They might have not considered that there are people in worse situations