- cross-posted to:
- leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world
- politics@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world
- politics@lemmy.world
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/37465506
Greedy fake Christian appoints greedy fake Christian
You must log in or register to comment.
Fuck yes! I have “Evangelical Schism” on my 2025 bingo card.
Where’s my modern Martin Luther?!
You should read the Wikipedia page on this telascammer. Remeber that Wikipedia is probably limiting what they say to avoid nonsense.
tf kind of a news source is “the daily beast”? That sounds like an r34 subr*ddit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Daily_Beast
The Daily Beast began publishing on October 6, 2008. Its founding editor was Tina Brown, a former editor of Vanity Fair and The New Yorker as well as the short-lived Talk magazine.
The name of the site was taken from a fictional newspaper in Evelyn Waugh’s novel Scoop.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scoop_(novel)
Scoop is a 1938 novel by the English writer Evelyn Waugh. It is a satire of sensationalist journalism and foreign correspondents.
I mean, the founder has good credentials and the name is literally from a satirical book about sensationalist journalism, which vibes with the publication being described as a “high-end tabloid.”
Plus it’s a well known publication and has been for a decade.
Some dudes just love telling on themselves.
For me it’s just confusion because of how I personally handle things.
If I find an unusual source… I research the source. I find as much information as I can to figure out how trustworthy the source is. It’s basically automatic.
So I don’t really understand the “I’m just gonna say I’ve never heard of this because I can’t be bothered to look something up in under 30 seconds” especially when it comes to more well-known publications.
