• itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    They are quite aware of the constitution and it’s implications. Complicated, sure, but not impossible. I recommend to listen to van Aken talking about the topic.

    Calling it a lie is disingenuous.

      • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Why do you keep calling it a lie? Their plan is concrete, actionable and reasonable likely to pass the courts. The one-time wealth tax in time of crisis (Vermögensabgabe) is well-grounded in the constitution and has precedent. The year-on-year wealth tax (Vermögenssteuer) also is based on the constitution (Art. 106 GG) and already exists on the books, it’s just permanently suspended because the constitutional court declared it illegal, for the reason that it didn’t treat real estate the same as other wealth. Which can be fixed, if a government wanted to.

        Is your problem that it won’t happen because Die Linke overwhelmingly likely won’t be part of the next government?

        • Actionschnils@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Its about making it work.

          You already know that a lot of the rich people arent paying a lot of taxes, right?

          If you want to make it work a intended, you have to break the constitution.

          • federal reverse@feddit.org
            shield
            M
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            Please find some source to corroborate that beyond “(imho)”. I already removed your previous comment for misinfo.

            E.g. while the existing wealth tax law has been ruled unconstitutional, that is only because of a few details in the law. The only reason that the law has never been reformed in a way that is constitutional is that CxU and SPD were always against a reform. I.e. the only reason is that it would hurt large donors.

          • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            How? This is about enforcing existing laws. The rich not paying taxes, through legal loopholes and illegal tax fraud, is the exact problem. Your still haven’t explained what about the plan would break the constitution.