• Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 天前

    I really don’t understand the significance of this. If there were really a market for epaper watches, why did no one make them for the last 10 years? Was PebbleOS really so amazing that no one could replicate anything similar?

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 小时前

      Fitbit bought them out after they mismanaged their expansion. My pebble kept working, but I lost the charging cable as I recall and couldn’t get a replacement.

        • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 小时前

          Sorry, I was being pulled in two directions when I wrote that. Meant to talk about how ePaper watches were basically deleted from the market by Fitbit. They owned the IP and didn’t make any, as far as I know. Now smart watches are a multi billion dollar market that Pebble helped popularize (maybe even created), and Pebble was cast aside. The hardware was so simple, effective, cheap, reliable, and lacking bloat that you could buy one and have it work perfectly for ages. Totally against the trend with tech.

        • keyez@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 小时前

          Nothing has, people still want a pebble and nobody has made one in 10 years. this project aims to do that again

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 小时前

            If nothing’s changed then what makes them think people will start buying them again?

            • keyez@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 小时前

              Nothing has changed with the demand. There always was and has been demand albeit small. I’m going to order one for example

    • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 天前

      At the time it made way more sense because the “traditional” smart watches were way worse. Not even one day battery life. I would say Pebble still wins on size though - actually normal watch sized.

      As for why they didn’t catch on… Probably a little bit ahead of their time, and also less shiny.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 小时前

        Not asking why they didn’t catch on. I’m asking why it would catch on today when it hasn’t since the Pebble died. And why, even if a very small user-base exists for this type of product, no one has made them since.

        • FizzyOrange@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 小时前

          A couple of possible reasons:

          1. If it’s a new company with fewer standards then more niche products become more viable. I don’t know exactly what the situation at Pebble was but if they took lots of VC funding they can’t turn around and say “ok we’re just going to trundle along with this niche watch that is loved, but only by a few people”. A small company can do that.

          2. Advertising / brand awareness. Pebble was very well known, but if you make some random alternative nobody is even going to learn of your existence. This attempt is using the actual Pebble code and it’s run by the ex-Pebble people.

          3. Don’t underestimate the software effort. Now that they have most of the code, resurrecting it is a lot easier.

          Having said that, I would probably put my money on them doing a Kickstarter (which will do very well based on nostalgia), delivering a product that can’t really compete with modern smart watches, and then slowly fading into the night. Hope not but I won’t hold my breath. (I can’t really wear watches anyway so it doesn’t really affect me.)

    • brutalist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 天前

      I would drop my Galaxy Watch in a second if I could get a brand new pebble on better hardware with more sensors.

    • Colonel Panic@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 天前

      it’s a niche market, like not enough people wanting to buy a compact sub-5" flagship phone, so i’ll never get one. let people enjoy it :)

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 天前

        Oh, don’t me wrong, I will likely buy one. I am the target audience.

        But either it’s a niche market with not enough customers or it isn’t. The OS doesn’t change that.

    • Barbecue Cowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 天前

      The Pebble platform doesn’t make it super easy to monetize itself beyond hardware sales. There’s no reason to make a watch like this from a business perspective. Plenty probably could, but no one with the resources to do it properly wanted to make something similar.

    • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 天前

      Was PebbleOS really so amazing that no one could replicate anything similar?

      Probably no-one just took the responsibility to start doing it for free. Foss projects usually start from one or couple bored people just really wanting something so bad they’ll start putting big hours to make it real