• FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s a bummer that religion is so good at programming people that they just kind of ignore everything contrary to their worldview.

    • Doug Holland@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Once that’s their habit, it becomes easy to also ignore things more urgent and real than religion.

  • atempuser23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s important to note what that means to Christians

    It means that god is not here.

    If Jesus is god and god will return god is absent from the earth. Christians have been abandoned by god

    Unless God is here is jesus is not and that means jesus is not god. Christians are worshiping something that isn’t god. Christians have abandoned god.

    • ivanafterall ☑️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Depending on the flavor of Christian, they’d generally argue that the “Holy Spirit” is still here. Part of the trinity and thus fully God, while not being the entirety of God, or something along those lines.

      It’s all bullshit, for sure, but I don’t think your argument would persuade many Christians.

  • Simulation6
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    14 hours ago

    ‘For I tell you, there are those living today that will see the second coming of the lord’.

    Been going on for 2000+ years now.

    • Shortstack@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      15 hours ago

      And that would be a positive quality, right alongside social justice warrior.

      They think it’s a grave insult but those without empathy cannot fathom the concept of caring about others

        • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Because if he acted like he does in the New Testament any good feelings towards him would soon sour:

          • His commands are entirely based on personal responsibility. Giving to the poor was voluntary. Even in the church after his death. He never instituted a church rule for how much one should give, in the early church it was led by conscience.

          • He healed people but specifically to demonstrate God’s power, not because people deserved a healthy life. Many people went unhealed during his lifetime and after.

          • He specifically tells Christians to continue paying taxes to a dictator and to concentrate on other things

          • He condemns “porneia”. Which to a first century Jew unambiguously included gay sex. (Jesus says he’s specifically ministering to Jews)

          • As the Word of God he’s the source of the Jewish Torah and all its associated problems

          • No comment on the right to bodily autonomy. No comment on age of consent. No comment on slavery. Which is all a tacit acceptance of the status quo…

          Etc

          For the record I think the right would hate him just as much just for different reasons.

          • Maeve@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            About those translations. “Tesla tsela” can be rib or side. Jewish people already said yhwh is androgyne, some posited hermaphrodite, so it seems to me it means side, as in half (which is just repackaging Sumerian religion, yhwh being a Canite desert storm warrior God, El being the peaceful one). Jesus never addressed homosexuality, but he did address adultery afaict, and even sex work they dragged only the woman caught in the act before the public, and not the man, where the penalty for either was the same.

            I read Jesus as being socialist. Pay your taxes, feed the hungry, heal the sick, clothe the naked, take care of prisoners.

            • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              “Tesla” can be rib or side.

              I don’t follow the relevance of this

              Jesus never addressed homosexuality

              One could say the same about unrelated acts such as incest and beastiality but no one thinks he was permissive of those things. That’s because he was talking to Jews and condemned “porneia” (‘unlawful sex’), which to Jews unambiguously included all of the above including gay sex.

              I read Jesus as being socialist

              I do too, but more as an anarcho-socialist. He gave no instruction on how to run a state. And all he says about property and conflict resolution (basically pacifist, let yourself be robbed, wronged and stolen from, do not exercise violence towards another) do not carry over into how to run a state at all.

              I don’t tend to use the word because it often implies progressive social values and rights which Jesus’ ministry bears little example of. (He was progressive in the first century, but not the 21st century)

              • Maeve@kbin.earth
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                That was meant to be tsela. Autocorrect is a bane.

                I don’t see how you get where he said let yourself be robbed. But I guess different brains work differently.

                ETA: maybe the gospel writers who lived hundreds of years after missed some stuff. Real time reports do the same. Or maybe they deliberately left some stuff out. Hard to say since there’s no proof Jesus ever existed.

                For real kicks, check out the Ethiopian Bible. A lot of lore that’s not mentioned in the canonical gets explained there. Enoch (Metatron) and Testament of Solomon are wild. It’s what Goetian magic is based on. Which in my best estimation are early attempts at self-psychology, but that just comes from having listened to a couple of Don Duquett presentations.

                • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  I don’t see how you get where he said let yourself be robbed

                  “Do not resist an evil person. If anyone wants to sue you and take your shirt, hand over your coat as well. If anyone forces you to go one mile, go with them two miles. Give to the one who asks you…” - Matthew 5:39

    • metaStatic@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      19 hours ago

      There are more people alive today than have ever lived so it’s probably closer than you think, especially when they have to also be Christians

      • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        18 hours ago

        This got me intrigued so I looked it up a bit. Population reference bureau estimates there have been 117 billion humans ever. a rough estimate would place 80-85 billion of them from 0-2025 (when Abrahamic religions came about) thanks to explosive population growth

        Granted this is all reallllly rough estimates but I still say it’s many more than a billion at this point. However as you said selecting for Christians is a big factor.

        Over the years Christianity evolved from a niche to the largest religion in the world (though Islam is poised to overtake it)

        100: ~7 million (about 1% of world population) 500: ~30 million (10%) 1000: ~50 million (10-12%) 1500: ~100 million (15-20%) 1900: ~560 million (35%) 2000: ~2 billion (33%) 2025: ~2.4 billion (31%)

        So historically we can estimate the total number Christians who have died is about 23 billion based on 80-85 billion total born and roughly 25-30% historically, giving us roughly 25 billion born (2 billion remain alive as seen above).

        That said this is based on wild estimates and is obviously not accurate in any meaningful way. I’m just bored and I have to watch my sick dog so I’m giving myself math homework

  • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Well based on the Christian views, all those that believe well be resurrected. So yes it will be a lifetime.

    Kind of confuses me cause like aren’t they in heaven now and now got pushed back to material plane? Or were they in stasis?

    • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Imagine being dragged away from literal heaven and being forced to come back to Earth as it is now (or how it will be in the future.)

      I don’t know about y’all, but that doesn’t sound like something I’d look forward to.

      • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Well I guess it’s closer to norse mythology where they are in heaven to prepping except it’s for earth colonization. I dk.