A Florida mom is suing a company that vets guests for Airbnb after she says she was banned from the short-term rental platform over a pair of past felony convictions that have since been expunged.

The mistake, which the lawsuit argues never should have happened, left the woman unable to take her daughter to a series of potentially lucrative rodeo competitions, and prevented the girl — whose winnings provide the family’s main source of income — from qualifying for the barrel racing national championships.

  • Zahtu@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Imagine having your Kids success in Sports and competitions be the main source of income for the whole family. What are these parents doing? Thats a Lot of Stress and pressure for a kid to experiences in their formative years.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I agree, but it’s not the main point. They may have few options when they can’t get their expunged records to go away.

  • deegeese
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Sounds like an open and shut case of libel.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Booking the family into hotels and RV parks became the only option for Doe, which were often either unaffordable or too small for everyone to fit, the complaint states.

    I dunno about all that…

    It’s a legit question about how the expungement of records works tho. Back in the day no one kept records on hand, now if a record exists and part of it is expunged…

    Those records still exist out there somewhere.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Expungement requires it to be removed from all public records. No exceptions.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        How are these public?

        They’re copies of old records that are owned by private companies

        Like, that’s the entire point of the article and the lawsuit…

        • BrikoX@lemmy.zipM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Public record can’t be owned by a private company and if they maintain a copy, they are responsible with keeping information up-to-date and if the record is expunged they are by law required to destroy it.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            You can have an argument with me about it, or you could read the article…

            Personally, I think the chances of you believing the article is a lot higher than you believing me rewording the article.

            Like, even just explaining the difference between “can” and “legally can” would help you out here. But there’s just a lot of steps likely involved with getting you caught up.

            Just read the article