Why call it “privacy policy”, when it clearly is “no privacy policy”?
deny the parasite profit
Gereed for sure!
People calling the Sun worthless scum are missing the point, which is that this shit ought to be illegal.
It’s a UK company.
They are under no obligation to comply with GDPR.
Yahoo JP actually shut out all foreign (or at least EU) traffic. They could do the same here if they’d want toAs I understand it, the “UK GDPR” is basically the same thing as the EU’s GDPR. They need to maintain “adequacy” to continue to comply with the UK’s laws and guidelines, so they can’t simply block all non-UK traffic.
Yep, there’s been no repeal of the GDPR laws, so they are still officially on the books in the UK.
It may be. The ICO issued some long waffling guidelines that clarified exactly nothing about it recently https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/online-tracking/consent-or-pay/about-this-guidance/#law
The S*n us a far right shitrag
Scum practice by a scum company. Nothing of value is lost by not going there.
I don’t even think this is top 5 worst things they’ve done.
gotta milk those last 5 readers
Classic rent seeking spiral
In fairness, they’d have to pay me to view their article. Not read, mind you, just view. I don’t think I could force myself to read their articles even if paid.
The sun taught me that not everything that is posted like news has to have any basis, and you should outright forget entirely what you read when it doesn’t come from a trusted source.
The Sun is a garbage Buzzfeed wannabe anyway. Much better news sites out there
