• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Monero is the gold standard for that very reason.

    I accept the policies of DBZer0, That’s why I didn’t start this discussion on their instance.

    My core thesis still stands, a discussion about privacy must include all options, including private fungible digital money

    Moving all of the privacy discussion to a place where the privacy discussion is limited to a subset of things that are private. It’s probably not good for the privacy community

    • fxomt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Crypto is banned on the instance in general, i have my own reasons for disliking it but if you get Db0’s approval i have no issue and will remove it. He created the rule, surely he has the reasons.

      It’s harmful for the environment and [most] of them are public (excluding monero but the first point stands), i assume that’s Db0’s reasons.

      Moving all of the privacy discussion to a place where the privacy discussion is limited to a subset of things that are private. It’s probably not good for the privacy community

      Perhaps, but i’m bound by the instances rules.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Perhaps, but i’m bound by the instances rules.

        This is the fediverse, you are not bound to an instance

        • fxomt@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 days ago

          The community itself is hosted on to dbzer0, so i kind of am (the rules of the community, you can praise monero outside the instances’ communities).

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            We are here, on lemmy.world, redirecting people to the community on DBZer0. That is why I’m concerned

            The discussion is about the right home for privacy discussions. I’m happy that privacy@dbzer0 exists, but I am disturbed that we are trying to consolidate all conversations to a community that does not allow all conversations.

            • Blaze@lemmy.zipOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              a community that does not allow all conversations.

              LW has blocked !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com, how do you think they’ll react if people start asking “which VPN should I use to be anonymous and torrent”?

              As I said in another comment, crypto can be discussed in another community.

            • fxomt@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I am disturbed that we are trying to consolidate all conversations to a community that does not allow all conversations.

              privacy@dbzer0 is just another community, if you don’t like it there’s 4 more privacy communities to choose from, that’s the magic of the fediverse :)

              I’m not trying to consolidate all conversations to privacy@dbzer0, it’s supposed to be a community that solves the problems in the original fedigrow thread. If you don’t believe that they’re problems, then you are more than free to keep using !privacy@lemmy.world, !privacy@lemmy.ca. They’re all great :)