• palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    They could have just renamed it. Wordpad’s Win3.11 predecessor was called “Write”, for example, so that name could have been revived.

    For a long time, write.exe still existed and all it did was launch Wordpad, so they’d only have to reverse that.

    They could also have chosen another name entirely. Or, since they’ve recently added a bunch of unnecessary crap to Notepad, they might as well have merged the two.

    “Confusion” is merely an excuse.

    • Nollij
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I never said confusion, nor did I say it had anything to do with the name. WordPad development takes time and money with minimal return. It also provides a very minimal subset of the capabilities of Word. People expecting Word capabilities are frustrated by the limitations of WordPad, and are actually happier being told it’s simply not available without additional purchase.

      • palordrolap@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s a rich text box with a few controls to enable or disable those features at certain points in the text. The whole thing was entirely built from components used elsewhere in the OS, or at least the earlier versions were. One competent employee could manage it in an afternoon; a week at the outside. If Microsoft has let it get so ridiculously bloated that it’s now unmanageable by one person, that’s on them.

        I never said confusion

        People expecting Word capabilities

        Now, why would they expect that?

        See also: Java and JavaScript.